首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

比较体育学科性质流变与发展研究
引用本文:高飞.比较体育学科性质流变与发展研究[J].体育科学,2011,31(4):90-97.
作者姓名:高飞
作者单位:天津体育学院教务处体育教育训练学教研室,天津,300381
摘    要:比较体育究竟是一门独立学科还是某一研究领域或研究方法的问题始终拷问着国内外研究者,至今围绕这一问题所做出的种种回答反映了学界6种具有代表性的观点,或执着于一种研究方法的追求,或倾向于一门独立学科、一门兼应用学科和理论学科于一身的交叉学科的主张,或衷情于一门最贴近现实的前沿性综合学科或某一研究领域、某一涵盖体育所有事实乃至整个领域的学科群的见解。诸如此类观点或多或少地具有某些积极特征且又存在着明显不足,因而有关比较体育学科性质的分歧与争鸣将会继续存在。

关 键 词:比较体育  学科性质  交叉学科  综合学科  研究领域

Research on Changes and Development of the Disciplinary Features of Comparative Physical Education and Sport in China
GAO Fei.Research on Changes and Development of the Disciplinary Features of Comparative Physical Education and Sport in China[J].China Sport Science,2011,31(4):90-97.
Authors:GAO Fei
Institution:GAO Fei Teaching and Research Division of Physical Education and Sport Theory,Tianjin University of Sport,Tianjin 300381,China.
Abstract:The question that comparative physical education and sport(CPES) is on earth an independent discipline or a research field or a research method has been perplexing the researchers at home and abroad.It is found that the various answers to the very issue which have so far been made at least reflect six representative academic views in the field of CPES.Some researchers dedicate themselves to the pursuit of a research method,some researchers have been willing to think of CPES as an independent discipline,or a...
Keywords:comparative physical education and sport  discipline features  cross discipline  comprehensive discipline  research field  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号