| 论国际体育仲裁院与竞技临时仲裁及《仲裁法》的关系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄怀权.论国际体育仲裁院与竞技临时仲裁及《仲裁法》的关系[J].山东体育学院学报,2007,23(4):19-21. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄怀权 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东商学院体育部,广东,广州,510320 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对中国竞技体育中临时仲裁的含义及法律性质进行了初步分析,并将其与国际体育仲裁进行比较。认为,目前在我国统一仲裁制度中没有《体育仲裁法》调整体育纠纷的情况下,根据国际奥委会的规定,为了解决北京奥运会期间相关的体育纠纷,ICAS(国际体育仲裁理事)可以在北京设立一个临时的体育仲裁机构,然而,我国的仲裁法不承认临时仲裁机构,这就可能会在仲裁裁决的执行上导致中外当事人的不公平。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育仲裁 临时仲裁 仲裁法 国际体育仲裁院 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-2076（2007）04-0019-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-05 |
On CAS' relationship with the ad hoc arbitration of competitive sports and PRC arbitration |
| |
| HUANG Huai-quan.On CAS'''' relationship with the ad hoc arbitration of competitive sports and PRC arbitration[J].Journal of Shandong Physical Education Institute,2007,23(4):19-21. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Huai-quan |
| |
| Institution: | Dept. of PE, Guangdong Commercial College, Guangzhou 510320, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper analyzes the meaning and legal property of Chinese temporary arbitration in competitive sports and compares it with CAS.The author argues that with the current situation in which China is lack of arbitral laws to settle disputes in sports.It is a wise option for ICAS that it set up a temporary sports arbitration in Beijing to settle disputes during Beijing Olympic Games.However,PRC Arbitration does not recognize temporary arbitration agency,which will cause unfairness between Chinese and foreign parties in the execution of the arbitral award. |
| |
| Keywords: | ad hoc arbitration temporary arbitration arbitration CAS |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
