Chinese Question in the Olympic Movement: From the Perspective of Taiwan |
| |
| Authors: | Yi-Ling Huang Chen-Huei Wang |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Sport History, Cologne, Germanyuluhxauh@gmail.com;3. Institute of Sport Sociology, Cologne, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | Title and flag are the baggage of Taiwan's complex past that was brought from China to Taiwan by the Kuomintang. It led to a series of conflicts between the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China. Taiwanese perspective has been used to discuss these sensitive issues. The impact of the international political situation on the China issue is discussed. The roles that IOC presidents – Avery Brundage, Lord Killanin and Antonio Samaranch – played in the development of the Chinese Question are analysed. In summary, due to exchange of international politics and the attitudes of the IOC presidents, the Taipei-based Committee had adopted the following names: the Chinese Olympic Committee (1949–1959), the Taiwan Olympic Committee (1959–1968) and the Republic of China Olympic Committee (1968–1979). Due to international reality, Taiwan finally had to use the name Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee (1981 to present) and pay dearly for its continued participation in the Olympic Movement by changing its national symbols. The other sports federations in Taiwan were furthermore asked to follow the example of the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and change their names and flags. Otherwise, they would not be allowed to maintain their memberships. |
| |
| Keywords: | Chinese question Chinese Taipei Olympic movement Republic of China in Taiwan Olympic Games |
|
|
