| 休闲足球运动与中强度持续跑步健身效果比较的系统综述 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李阳,焦巍,郑鹭宾.休闲足球运动与中强度持续跑步健身效果比较的系统综述[J].上海体育学院学报,2021(3):85-96. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李阳 焦巍 郑鹭宾 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 青岛大学体育学院;北京体育大学中国足球运动学院;上海健康医学院体育部;上海体育学院体育教育训练学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的近10年来休闲足球运动(RS)的健身效果成为国外学者关注的热点,而足球科学与健康的研究成果在国内较缺乏。通过系统梳理相关文献,比较RS与传统健身方式中强度持续跑步(RU)的健身效果,进一步评估RS的锻炼效果,为推动健康中国建设、丰富大众健身方案、普及足球运动提供理论支持与启示。方法通过检索、搜集PubMed、EBSCO-Medline、Web of Science、CNKI、万方等中外数据库相关文献,并进行筛选,共纳入12篇文献。结果在改善中青年普通人群静息心率、体脂、VO2max、姿势平衡等方面,RS与RU的干预效果显著,且效果相似;在改善血压、瘦体重、跳跃能力、骨骼质量方面,50%的研究结果表明RS的干预效果优于RU。结论持续一定时间和一定频率的RS,在改善中青年普通人群的健康效果方面与相似强度、相同时间的RU相似,在某些方面可能更优;对于慢性病患者干预效果仍需高水平随机对照试验进行验证。应进一步推动RS在国内的研究,关注RS对儿童青少年健康的影响,研制适合不同人群的RS健身方案,进一步确定RS的健身效果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 休闲足球运动 中强度持续跑步 健身效果 系统综述 |
Systematic Review on comparison of Health Effects between Recreational Soccer and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Running |
| |
| LI Yang,JIAO Wei,ZHENG Lubin.Systematic Review on comparison of Health Effects between Recreational Soccer and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Running[J].Journal of Shanghai Physical Education Institute,2021(3):85-96. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Yang JIAO Wei ZHENG Lubin |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Physical Education,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,Shandong,China;China Football College,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084,China;Department of Sport,Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences,Shanghai 201318,China;School of Physical Education and Training,Shanghai University of Sport,Shanghai 200438,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective In the past decade,the health effect of recreational soccer(RS)has become the focus of foreign scholars,while the research on soccer science and health is relatively lacking in China.This study is to compare the health effects of RS and the traditional way of moderate-intensity continuous running(RU)are compared through the systematic review of relevant literature,and the exercise effects of RS are further evaluated,aiming to provide theoretical support for promoting the construction of Healthy China,enriching the public fitness program,and popularizing soccer.Methods The relevant literature in PubMed,EBSCO MEDLINE,Web of Science,CNKI,and Wan fang data was searched and screened from January 2009 to December 2019.A total of 12 literatures were included.Results①Regrading the improvement of resting heart rate,body fat,VO2max and posture balance,both RS and RU had significant and similar effects;②In terms of improving blood pressure,body weight reduction,jumping ability and bone quality,the results showed inconsistency.The intervention effects of RS and RU were significant,and 50%of the results showed that RS was better than RU.Conclusion 12-16 weeks,2-3 times/week of RS can improve the health effects of young and middle-aged people,similar to continuous running with the same intensity for the same time,and may be better in some aspects;for the intervention effects of RS and RU in patients with chronic diseases,it still needs to be verified by high-level RCT.It is suggested to promote the research of RS in China,stress the influence of RS on the health of teenagers and children,develop the best RS sports program for different people and further research on the health effects of RS. |
| |
| Keywords: | recreational soccer moderate-intensity continuous running health effect systematic review |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
