首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国一流大学建设高校科研差异及态势
引用本文:李彦华,张月婷,牛蕾.中国一流大学建设高校科研差异及态势[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(9).
作者姓名:李彦华  张月婷  牛蕾
作者单位:中北大学经济与管理学院,山西太原030051;中北大学创新研究中心,山西太原030051;中北大学经济与管理学院,山西太原,030051
基金项目:山西省教育科学规划课题资助项目“山西省产学研用协同创新的机制、障碍与对策研究”(ZX-18039);山西省社会科学联合会重点课题资助项目“山西省战略性新兴产业人力资源预测研究”(SSKLZDKT2017074));中北大学哲学社会科学研究课题“山西省高新技术产业人才培养机制研究--基于‘多元协同’视角”(2018JG004)
摘    要:为有针对性地推动中国高校走向世界一流大学的目标,以41所中国一流大学建设高校为研究对象,应用数据包络分析(DEA)和Malmquist指数,从静态和动态两角度测度其2013—2017年间的科研效率。研究发现:静态上,这些高校整体科研水平较高,区域间科研效率呈现东部>西部>中部>东北的差异,不同高校属性分类中综合类科研效率最高、理工类次之;动态上,研究期限内这些高校的科研全要素生产率受技术进步指标影响,总体呈现小幅上升趋势,东部与中部和西部的科研效率区域差距拉大、与东北部的缩小,农林类高校科研效率稳步提升。总之,中国一流大学建设高校的内部科研差距继续存在,但整体上差异将不断缩小。

关 键 词:一流大学建设高校  科研效率  数据包络分析(DEA)模型  Malmquist指数
收稿时间:2018/11/23 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/5/9 0:00:00

Research on the Tendency and Differences of Scientific Research in the Construction of First-class Universities in China
Abstract:In order to aim at promoting Chinese universities to be world-class universities, this paper takes 41 first-class universities in China as research objects, and applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist index (DEA) to measure the efficiency of scientific research in 2013 -2017 from both static and dynamic perspectives. The results show that, in static state, the overall scientific research level of these universities is high, and the efficiency of regional scientific research presents the difference of east > west > central > northeast, and the efficiency of comprehensive scientific research is the highest in the attribute classification of different universities, followed by the science and technology; dynamically, the total factor productivity of scientific research in these universities during the research period is affected by the index of technological progress, showing a slight upward trend as a whole, the regional gap in the efficiency of scientific research between the eastern and central and western regions is widening, while the regional disparity is narrowing between the east and the northeast, and the scientific research efficiency in agricultural and forestry universities is steady improvement. In short, the internal scientific research gap of China''s first-class universities continues to exist, but the overall differences will continue to narrow.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号