| 典型省市新型研发机构绩效评价指标体系的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈小辉,陈建敏,罗莉萍,苏炜.典型省市新型研发机构绩效评价指标体系的对比研究[J].科技管理研究,2023(17):59-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈小辉 陈建敏 罗莉萍 苏炜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东省科技基础条件平台中心 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广东省科技计划项目“东盟沿线国家科研人员的科技创新能力提升与标准化培训”（2022A0505060001）； |
| |
| 摘 要： | 选取北京市、河北省、江苏省、浙江省、安徽省、山东省、河南省、广东省等八个典型省市的新型研发机构绩效评价指标体系，重点对比分析三级指标个数、定性指标占比、指标独立性、分值权重分配等方面的特征。河北省的评价指标个数最少，且均为定量化指标。新型研发机构的绩效评价，应充分考虑评价过程复杂性、客观性、合理性和分类评估，确定新型研发机构绩效的最佳评价指标体系以及分值权重，进而促进新型研发机构的健康发展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 新型研发机构 绩效评价指标 分值权重 指标独立性 分类评估 |
| 收稿时间： | 2023/1/30 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2023/3/29 0:00:00 |
Comparison and study on performance evaluation index system of new research and development institutions in typical provinces and cities |
| |
| Abstract: | With the rapid development of high-tech industries and new research and development (R&D) institutions, it is particularly important to evaluate the operation performance of new R&D institutions objectively, accurately and efficiently. The performance evaluation index systems of new R&D institutions in Beijing, Hebei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Shandong, Henan and Guangdong, are selected as the research objectives. The number of three-level indicators, the proportion of qualitative indicators, the independence of indicators, and the distribution of score weights are compared and analyzed. Hebei Province has the least number of evaluation indicators, which are quantitative indicators. The performance evaluation of new R&D institutions should consider the complexity, objectivity and rationality of the evaluation process fully, and determine the best evaluation index system and score weight, and then the healthy development of new R&D institutions can be promoted. |
| |
| Keywords: | new research and development institution performance evaluation index score weight indicator independence categorized evaluation |
|
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
