| 中国政府采购促进科技创新政策的组织管理机制及国际比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王小黎,刘云,陈领弟.中国政府采购促进科技创新政策的组织管理机制及国际比较[J].科技管理研究,2022(19). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王小黎 刘云 陈领弟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京理工大学 管理与经济学院,中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院,中原工学院 经济管理学院;中原工学院 经济管理学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点国际合作研究项目“新兴产业全球创新网络形成机制、演进特征及对创新绩效的影响研究”(71810107004)；国家社会科学基金重大项目“以创新能力、质量、实效、贡献为导向的科技人才评价体系研究”(21ZDA016)；国家重点研发计划项目重点专项“科技成果与数据资源产权交易技术”(2017YFB1401100)。 ,陈领弟3 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文以中国和典型国家的政府采购促进科技创新政策文件为研究样板，从法律效力结构的角度运用政策计量工具，分析中国政府在制定此方面政策的组织管理机制；从促进节能环保、促进科技型中小企业发展、促进高新技术产品的政府采购和优先采购国货等四个维度，开展中国政府采购促进科技创新政策的国际比较分析，找出中国与这些国家之间的差异，及亟需解决的问题。研究结果表明，一方面，政策制定时间分布不均匀，需要遵循一定的周期性；绝大部分国家部委参与及主导次数均低于平均值，需要提高其制定政策的参与度；另一方面，需要进一步完善政策工具，包括：建立中小型企业供应商数据库；制定分级制度和后评价制度，制定创新产品和服务的具体实施办法，对进口产品进行分类管理等。
|
| 关 键 词： | 政府采购 科技创新政策 作用机制 国际比较 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021/6/15 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021/12/17 0:00:00 |
Organization Mechanism and International Comparison of China's Government Procurement Policies for Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation |
| |
| Abstract: | Taking the policy documents of government procurement for promoting scientific and technological innovation in China and major scientific and technological powers as the research sample, this paper uses policy metric tools to analyze the organization mechanism of the Chinese government in formulating the policies from the perspective of legal effectiveness structure; From the four dimensions of promoting energy conservation and environmental protection, promoting the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, promoting the government procurement of high-tech products and giving priority to the procurement of domestic goods, it carries out the international comparative analysis of China''s government procurement policies for promoting scientific and technological innovation to find out the differences between China and these countries, and the problems that need to be solved urgently. The results show that, on the one hand, the time distribution of policy-making is uneven and needs to follow a certain periodicity; the participation and leading times of most national ministries are lower than the average, so it is necessary to improve their participation in policy-making. One the other hand, the policy tools need to be further improved, including: establishing a supplier database for small and medium-sized enterprises, formulating the grading system and post evaluation system, formulating the specific implementation measures for innovative products and services, and implementing classified management of imported products. |
| |
| Keywords: | Government procurement Scientific and technological innovation policy Mechanism International Comparison |
|
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
