首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于异质性技术的浙江省不同性质企业科技创新效率研究
引用本文:陈帆,姚卫新.基于异质性技术的浙江省不同性质企业科技创新效率研究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(1):77-85.
作者姓名:陈帆  姚卫新
作者单位:浙江科技学院经济与管理学院,浙江杭州310023;东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海200051;东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海200051
基金项目:浙江省软科学研究计划项目(2019C35048);杭州市科技计划软科学研究项目(20180834M32)。
摘    要:基于技术异质性,利用共同前沿理论研究2006-2017年浙江省不同性质企业的科技创新效率差距、技术差距、变化趋势和效率损失根源。研究结果表明,(1)2006-2017年间,浙江省不同性质企业的科技创新效率均值较低。外商投资企业、港澳台商投资企业和内资企业的科技创新效率均值依次递减,差距较小。(2)内资企业的技术水平反映了浙江省内的最优技术,外资企业和港澳台商企业与浙江省最优科技创新技术分别有12.3%和15%的差距。(3)内资企业和外商企业科技创新效率损失源于管理水平低下,港澳台商企业的效率损失同时来源于技术能力和管理水平不佳。

关 键 词:技术差距  科技创新  效率  共同前沿  数据包络分析
收稿时间:2020/4/3 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/4/29 0:00:00

Research on the Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Innovation of Enterprises with Different Nature in Zhejiang Province Based on Heterogeneous Technology
Chen Fan,Yao Weixin.Research on the Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Innovation of Enterprises with Different Nature in Zhejiang Province Based on Heterogeneous Technology[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2021,41(1):77-85.
Authors:Chen Fan  Yao Weixin
Institution:(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang University of Science and Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China;The Glorious Sun School of Business and Management,Donghua University,Shanghai 200051,China)
Abstract:Based on the heterogeneity of enterprise technology, this paper uses DEA model and meta-frontier theory to study the scientific and technological innovation efficiency gap and dynamic trend of different properties enterprises in Zhejiang Province from 2006 to 2017, We also analyzes the technology gap, change trend and the source of efficiency loss among different enterprises. The results show that:(1) From 2006 to 2017, the average efficiency of scientific and technological innovation of different enterprises in Zhejiang Province was low. The average efficiency of scientific and technological innovation of foreign-funded enterprises, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan funded enterprises and domestic funded enterprises decreases in turn, but the gap is small. Among domestic enterprises, private enterprises have the highest efficiency in scientific and technological innovation, while collective enterprises and joint-stock cooperative enterprises have the lower efficiency. It makes the domestic enterprises in the lowest efficiency by the efficiency difference between enterprises. In the past 12 years, domestic enterprises have been catching up in the efficiency of scientific and technological innovation, and surpassed foreign, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises in 2017.(2) The mean value of technical efficiency under the meta-frontier shows the optimal production frontier. The technology level of domestic enterprises reflects the best production technology in Zhejiang Province. There is still a gap of 12.3% between foreign-funded enterprises and the best innovation technology in Zhejiang Province. During the investigation period, the technology gap has been relatively balanced and gradually narrow. There is a big gap between the technological environment of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan invested enterprises and the optimal technology of Zhejiang Province in 2006 and 2007, but the technological gap is becoming smaller in the past 10 years.(3) The root of the loss of the efficiency in domestic enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises lies in the low level of management, The loss of efficiency of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises comes from poor technical ability and management level.
Keywords:Technology gap  Scientific and technological innovation  Efficient  Meta-frontier  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号