| 典型国家科技创新决策与咨询制度比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 万劲波,谢光锋,林慧,赵兰香.典型国家科技创新决策与咨询制度比较研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(6):601-611. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 万劲波 谢光锋 林慧 赵兰香 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190,中国科学院学部工作局 北京 100190,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 科技部专项任务（Y501601801） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在系统梳理科技创新决策与咨询制度概念及研究进展的基础上,以主要发达国家科技创新决策与咨询制度的基本现状和基础架构为主线,分析可资借鉴的经验。结合我国建立科技创新决策与咨询系统的需求,提出建立、完善国家科技创新决策与咨询制度的政策建议:建立国家宏观科技创新决策领导机构,减少政府创新管理职能重复;设立国家科技创新决策咨询机构,建立常态化联系沟通机制;加快推动决策咨询和智库体系建设法治化,建立多渠道、不同运行模式的科技创新顾问制度体系,不断探索并创新咨询模式和运行方式;加强科技创新决策与咨询能力建设,提高决策与咨询质量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技创新 决策与咨询制度 比较研究 |
| 修稿时间： | 2017/3/16 0:00:00 |
Comparative Study on Science and Technology Innovation Policy-making and Advisory System |
| |
| Wan Jinbo,Xie Guangfeng,Lin Hui and Zhao Lanxiang.Comparative Study on Science and Technology Innovation Policy-making and Advisory System[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(6):601-611. |
| |
| Authors: | Wan Jinbo Xie Guangfeng Lin Hui and Zhao Lanxiang |
| |
| Institution: | Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China,Academic Divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China,Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China and Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the summarization of the concept and research development of science and technology innovation (STI) policy-making and advisory system, this article takes the current status and framework of STI policy-making and advisory system in developed countries as the base line to analyze their quotable experiences. To meet the demand of establishing the STI policy-making and advisory institutions in China, policy suggestions are provided in terms of setting up and refining the STI policy-making and advisory system, including developing national leading organization for macro STI policy-making, reducing functional duplication of governmental innovation management, establishing statelevel STI policy-making and advisory bodies and normalized communication mechanism, accelerating the legalized STI advisory and think tank systems construction, setting up multi-channel STI advisory system with various operating patterns and continuously exploring and innovating advisory pattern and operating mode, strengthening STI policy-making and advisory system capacity building, and improving the quality of policy-making advices. |
| |
| Keywords: | science and technology innovation (STI) policy-making and advisory system comparative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
