| 高强度的环境规制能够促进国内大气科技创新吗？——以〖SO〗_2排放控制技术为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 林玲,赵子健,曹聪丽.高强度的环境规制能够促进国内大气科技创新吗？——以〖SO〗_2排放控制技术为例[J].科研管理,2018,39(12):45-52. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 林玲 赵子健 曹聪丽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.上海交通大学 安泰经济与管理学院，上海200030；
2.国泰君安证券股份有限公司 金融学院，上海200120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金重点项目：“新产业革命背景下我国产业转型的体制机制创新研究”（项目批准号：13AZD072，起止时间：2014.1-2018.12）；国家自然科学基金重点项目群之重点项目：“气候变化背景下低碳农林业发展战略及政策研究：基于作用、潜力和成本效益的分析”（项目批准号：71333010，起止时间：2014.1-2018.12）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从理论上来说，波特弱假说涉及双重外部性问题，即大气污染的负外部性和技术创新的正外部性，环境规制和知识产权保护合力才能予以切实彻底解决，而后者并没有得到普遍重视。本文认为，波特弱假说需要考虑知识产权保护强度。以SO_2排放控制技术为例，本文运采用2000-2013年省际省份面板数据，结合固定效应模型进行实证研究检验了知识产权保护对于波特弱假说的作用。结果发现，当知识产权保护较弱时，环境规制对大气科技创新具有呈现负向影响；。只有当知识产权保护较强时力度超过一定阈值时，环境规制才会对大气科技创新产生正向影响，波特弱假说成立。此外，环境规制和知识产权保护影响大气科技创新的交叉效应主要出现在企业，而非科研院所和个人，创新主体存在明显的差异性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 大气科技创新 环境规制 知识产权保护 SO2 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-12-23 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018-02-07 |
Environmental regulation and innovation in atmospheric science and technology by taking SO2 emission abatement technology as an example |
| |
| Lin Ling,Zhao Zijian,Cao Congli.Environmental regulation and innovation in atmospheric science and technology by taking SO2 emission abatement technology as an example[J].Science Research Management,2018,39(12):45-52. |
| |
| Authors: | Lin Ling Zhao Zijian Cao Congli |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;
2. Security and Finance Institute, Guotai Jun’an Securities Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Theoretically, weak Porter Hypothesis involves dual externalities including negative externality of pollution and positive externality of scientific and technological innovation. Environmental regulation should be combined with protection of intellectual property to completely solve the dual externalities, but the protection of intellectual property has not been paid enough attention in practice. Taking SO2 emission abatement technology as an example, this paper collects provincial data during 2000-2013, and adopts fixed effect model to examine the effect of intellectual property protection on weak Porter Hypothesis. The results show that when intellectual property protection is weak, environmental regulation has a negative impact on innovation in atmospheric science and technology. When intellectual property protection level exceeds a certain threshold, environmental regulation begins to have a positive impact on the innovation, and weak Porter Hypothesis is established. Moreover, cross effect of environmental regulation and intellectual property protection on the innovation commonly appears in firms rather than universities or individuals. |
| |
| Keywords: | atmospheric science and technology innovation environmental regulation intellectual property protection SO2 |
|
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
