| 知识网络嵌入情境如何激活企业双元创新？——基于QCA的研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 欧忠辉,蔡猷花,胡慧芳.知识网络嵌入情境如何激活企业双元创新？——基于QCA的研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(6):94-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 欧忠辉 蔡猷花 胡慧芳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.福建商学院国际经贸学院，福建 福州350012；
2.福州大学经济与管理学院，福建 福州350108 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科规划基金面上项目（18BGL121，2018—2021）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（72072033，2021—2024）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（71702033，2018—2020）；福建省社科规划项目（FJ2020B035，2020—2023）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于双元创新存在目的和特征的差异，它们对创新环境也有不同的要求。探究创新环境中不同要素的联动作用与不同类型创新的关系对全面把握创新发展理念具有重要意义。基于集合论思想，构建包含知识网络嵌入、知识资源管理以及组织惯例三个层次六个因素在内的企业双元创新影响机制模型，通过对171家创新集群样本企业进行模糊集定性比较分析，研究发现：知识网络嵌入情境下实现高突破性创新有两类构型，类型1强调知识搜索与知识创造策略的组合，类型2强调知识网络嵌入下探索惯例与知识创造的组合、利用惯例与知识搜索的组合、知识共享条件缺失下网络治理机制与知识搜索、知识创造的协同作用；实现高渐进性创新也包括两类构型，类型1强调知识搜索与知识共享策略的组合，类型2强调知识网络嵌入下利用惯例与知识共享的组合、探索惯例与知识搜索的组合、知识创造条件缺失下网络治理机制与知识共享、知识搜索的协同作用。研究结果为解释企业双元创新提供新的视角，也为科技管理部门有效引导企业双元创新提供多个指导路径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 知识网络嵌入 组织惯例 知识资源管理 双元创新 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-06-22 |
| 修稿时间： | 2020-12-12 |
How knowledge network embedding context activates firms′ ambidextrous innovation?——A research based on the QCA method |
| |
| Ou Zhonghui,Cai Youhua,Hu Huifang.How knowledge network embedding context activates firms′ ambidextrous innovation?——A research based on the QCA method[J].Science Research Management,2021,42(6):94-101. |
| |
| Authors: | Ou Zhonghui Cai Youhua Hu Huifang |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of International Business and Economics, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350012, Fujian, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China; |
| |
| Abstract: | Firm′s high innovation performance not only depends on the investment of innovation resources, but also needs the support of corresponding innovation environment. Due to the differences in purpose and characteristics between incremental innovation and breakthrough innovation, these two types of innovation have different requirements on the input of heterogeneous knowledge resources and the innovation environment. Therefore, to promote the high-quality development of innovation, it is necessary to refine the research on the impact of innovation environment on different types of innovation. Different factors in the innovation environment do not necessarily have a causal relationship with ambidextrous innovation, but the complex linkage between multiple factors may lead to high breakthrough innovation or high incremental innovation respectively.
Based on the idea of set theory, this study developed a model of ambidextrous innovation influence mechanism which includes knowledge network embedding, knowledge resource management and organizational routine. Knowledge network embedding include network relationship, network location, and network size. Knowledge resource management include knowledge search, knowledge sharing and knowledge creation. Organizational routine includes explorative routine and exploitative routine. Through collecting data of knowledge network embedding, knowledge resource management and organizational routine, this study conducted a qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets which has the advantage on the research of asymmetric relations among 171 sample enterprises from innovation cluster, and finally obtained five antecedent conditional configurations of high breakthrough innovation and high incremental innovation respectively.
The results revealed that there are two types of configuration to achieve high breakthrough innovation in the context of knowledge network embedding. Type 1 emphasizes the combination of knowledge search and knowledge creation strategies. Type 2 emphasizes that under the embedding condition of knowledge network, the following configurations can all promote high breakthrough innovation: the combination of explorative routine and knowledge creation, the combination of exploitative routine and knowledge search, the synergistic effect of network governance mechanism, knowledge search and knowledge creation under the absence of knowledge sharing condition. There are two types of configuration to achieve high incremental innovation in the context of knowledge network embedding too. Type 1 emphasizes the combination of knowledge search and knowledge sharing strategies. Type 2 emphasizes that under the embedding condition of knowledge network, the following configurations can all promote high incremental innovation: the combination of exploitative routine and knowledge sharing, the combination of explorative routine and knowledge search, the synergistic effect of network governance mechanism, knowledge search and knowledge sharing under the absence of knowledge creation condition.
The results of research provide a new perspective for the interpretation of firm′s ambidextrous innovation, it also provides multiple guiding paths for scientific and technological management departments to guide firm′s ambidextrous innovation. |
| |
| Keywords: | knowledge network embedding organizational routine knowledge resource management ambidextrous innovation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
