| 时机选择、追赶陷阱与企业能力重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 臧树伟,张娜娜.时机选择、追赶陷阱与企业能力重构[J].科研管理,2021,42(9):87-93. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 臧树伟 张娜娜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.青岛大学 商学院，山东 青岛266071；
2.北京交通大学 经济管理学院，北京100044 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山东省自然科学基金青年基金项目：“时机选择与后发企业换道战略决策关系研究”（ZR2020QG016，2021.01—2023.12）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助：“管理滞后的内涵界定与内容解析”（2021JBW109，2021.04—2024.03）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 后发企业在追赶过程中如何选择最佳追赶时机、如何规避追赶陷阱、如何进行能力重构等问题一直是学界和业界关注的焦点。本文采用案例研究方法，通过剖析一家芯片企业过去15年间的成败得失，对上述问题进行逐一解答。研究发现：市场需求状况、市场分层结构、技术迭代速率、技术获取成本、产业分工体系、产业知识流动等时机因素在后发企业快速崛起和高速发展过程中发挥着重要的作用。研究还发现：组织惯性陷阱、创新范式陷阱、品牌低端化陷阱是后发企业在追赶过程中所面临的主要陷阱，企业要想规避上述陷阱，需要从组织学习、组织保障、创新协同、创新来源、品牌定位、品牌维护等方面寻求相应的对策和方案。上述研究发现丰富了现有后发追赶理论体系，同时，为处在探索和追赶之中的中国后发企业提供了宝贵的经验和借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 后发企业 时机选择 追赶陷阱 能力重构 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018-10-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019-05-30 |
Timing choice,catching-up trap and capability reconfiguration of enterprises |
| |
| Zang Shuwei,Zhang Nana.Timing choice,catching-up trap and capability reconfiguration of enterprises[J].Science Research Management,2021,42(9):87-93. |
| |
| Authors: | Zang Shuwei Zhang Nana |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; |
| |
| Abstract: | Innovation is the primary driving force for development. In the past 40 years, a large number of China′s latecomer firms have risen rapidly. While improving their market position and technological strength, they have realized the transformation from latecomer to leader. However, at the same time, the fact that most of the core technologies of China′s latecomer firms are controlled by others has not been fundamentally changed, and many China′s latecomer firms are still at the middle or low end of the global value chain. Under this background, how to choose the best time to catch up, how to avoid the catching-up trap and how to reconfigure the capability in the process of catching up have been the focus of the academia and the industry.
Previous studies have shown that timing choice and capability reconfiguration play an important role in the catch-up process of latecomer firms. However, there are some deficiencies in the studies of scholars in the following aspects: lack of deeper microscopic deconstruction of timing choice, lack of detailed research on catching-up trap, and lack of theoretical matching between capability reconfiguration and catching-up trap. Based on the above recognition, this paper will discuss the problem of China′s latecomer firms catching-up from three perspectives: timing choice, catching-up trap and capability reconfiguration. By analyzing the success and failure of a chip company in the past 15 years, this paper makes an in-depth study of how China′s latecomer firms choose the right time to catch up, how to identify the catch-up traps and how to reconfigure their capabilities in the process of catching up. Considering that the existing literature lacks systematic theoretical support for the above research problems, we adopt the exploratory case study scheme. We hope to enrich the existing theoretical system with the help of the research and discussion of relevant issues, and at the same time, provide some experience and reference for China′s latecomer firms.
It is found that market timing choice, technology timing choice and industry timing choice play an important role in the rapid development of latecomer firms. Among them, market timing is closely related to market demand gap, market stratification structure. The larger the market demand gap and the clearer the market stratification structure are, the more favorable it will be for latecomer firms to carry out catching-up work. Technical timing is closely related to technology update rate, technology acquisition cost. The faster the technology update rate is, the lower the technology acquisition cost will be, the more favorable it will be for latecomer firms to carry out catching-up work. Industrial timing is closely related to industrial division system, internal knowledge flow. The more perfect the industrial division system is and the faster the internal knowledge flow is, the more favorable it will be for latecomer firms to carry out catching-up work.
The research also finds that organizational inertia trap, innovation paradigm trap and brand low-end trap are the main reasons for latecomer firms to catch up with the failure. Among them, organizational inertia mainly comes from the behavioral inertia and cognitive inertia in the decision-making process of latecomer firms. The trap of innovation paradigm mainly comes from the ignorance of technological innovation in the process of catching up and the inability to realize effective collaboration between different innovation paradigms. The brand low-end trap mainly comes from the user demand lock formed by the long-term focus on the low-end market, as well as the lack of strategic planning and maintenance of high-end brands.
In order to avoid the above traps, latecomer firms need to seek corresponding countermeasures from the aspects of organizational capability reconfiguration, innovation capability reconfiguration and brand capability reconfiguration. Among them, organizational capability reconfiguration emphasizes that latecomer firms should improve the organizational dual learning capability (especially exploratory learning capability) by creating an environment and atmosphere conducive to learning, so as to overcome the behavioral inertia and cognitive inertia in the decision-making process. The reconfiguration of innovation capability emphasizes the improvement of latecomer firms in technology innovation through the realization of effective collaboration between different innovation paradigms and more diversified technology acquisition approaches. The reconfiguration of brand capability emphasizes that latecomer firms should not only formulate effective brand positioning strategy, but also construct efficient brand management system in the process of catching up with latecomer firms, so as to realize the transformation of brand from low-end to high-end.
The above research firstly deconstructs the theoretical black box of catching-up timing of latecomer firms from the micro level, which provides a reasonable theoretical support for explaining the rapid development of latecomer firms in the early stage. Secondly, it analyzes the reasons for the failure of latecomer firms to catch up, and interprets and refines various traps in the process of catching up, which can provide theoretical foundation for the follow-up empirical research. Finally, the specific dimensions of latecomer firms′ capability reconfiguration under the framework of catching-up are defined, and a complete closed-loop theoretical system is formed by establishing the logical connection between capability reconfiguration and catching-up trap. Practical significance: on the one hand, with the continuous improvement of market position and technical strength, it has become an irresistible trend for China′s latecomer firms to transform from latecomer to leaders. In this context, how to identify opportunities and choose the best timing to catch up has become the most urgent problem facing China′s latecomer firms. The exploration and analysis of market timing, technology timing and industry timing in this paper can provide feasible experience and reference for China′s latecomer firms. On the other hand, due to the long process of catching up, the analysis and interpretation of organizational inertia trap, innovation paradigm trap and brand low-end trap in this paper will help China′s latecomer firms to be more vigilant and reduce the risk of catching-up failure. In addition, targeted discussions on organizational capability reconfiguration, innovation capability reconfiguration and brand capability reconfiguration can also provide theoretical guidance and inspiration for China′s latecomer firms to focus on capability reconfiguration and avoid the catching-up trap. |
| |
| Keywords: | latecomer firm timing choice catching-up trap capability reconfiguration |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
