| 基于投入产出分析的北京市居民消费碳足迹研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董会娟,耿涌.基于投入产出分析的北京市居民消费碳足迹研究[J].资源科学,2012,34(3):494-501. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董会娟 耿涌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳110016／中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
2. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳,110016 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点项目(编号：71033004);国家科技支撑计划项目(编号：2011BAJ06B01);中国科学院百人计划项目(编号：08YBR111SS);辽宁省自然科学基金(编号：20101124)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 随着我国城镇化的加快和人民生活水平的提高,居民消费碳足迹越来越不容忽视。本文在综述国内外居民消费碳足迹的基础上,以投入产出法为基础,深入研究了北京市2007年居民消费直接碳足迹和隐含碳足迹的特征。结果显示：城镇居民碳足迹总量约7993万t,约为农村居民碳足迹总量1195.55万t的7倍。其中城镇居民碳足迹以隐含碳足迹为主,农村居民碳足迹以直接碳足迹为主。从居民消费隐含碳足迹构成来看,城镇居民以食品、交通和通信、文教娱乐用品和服务为主,分别为35.2%,14.1%和13.8%;农村居民主要以食品、居住、交通和通信为主,分别为32.4%,21.9%和12.3%。此外,居民消费隐含碳足迹随着收入水平的增加而增加,尤其是交通和通信碳足迹增加明显。最后针对北京市城乡居民消费碳足迹的特征,分别给出了相应的政策建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 隐含碳足迹 直接碳足迹 投入产出 居民消费 |
Study on Carbon Footprint of the Household Consumption in Beijing Based on Input-Output Analysis |
| |
| DONG Huijuan and GENG Yong.Study on Carbon Footprint of the Household Consumption in Beijing Based on Input-Output Analysis[J].Resources Science,2012,34(3):494-501. |
| |
| Authors: | DONG Huijuan and GENG Yong |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Industry is generally recognized as the main source of greenhouse gases. However, with rapid urbanization of China and significantly improved household living standard, the carbon footprint of household consumption should not be ignored any more. A general overview of carbon footprint of household consumption shows that domestic study on this field is less intensive than abroad and needs to be further developed. In this paper, a comprehensive study on direct and embodied carbon footprint of Beijing household consumption was made based on input-output analysis. The results reveal that: 1) Total carbon footprint of Beijing urban residents in 2007 was 79.93 Mt, about seven times of that of rural residents. And embodied carbon footprint is predominant in urban resident consumption while direct carbon footprint is predominant in rural resident consumption; 2) As for the composition of household consumption's embodied carbon footprint, Food, Transport & communications and Education, culture & recreation services are the top three categories for urban residents with ratios of 35.2% , 14.1% and 13.8% respectively. However for rural residents, Food, Residence and Transport & communications are the top three categories with ratios of 32.4%, 21.9% and 12.3% respectively; 3) Embodied carbon footprint increases with the residents'income level and the increase of carbon footprint from Transport and communications consumption is especially obvious. Carbon footprint composition of urban household consumption will also change with the increase of income level but that of rural household consumption is relatively stable. At the end of the paper, corresponding policy proposals for rural and urban household consumption were given separately according to carbon footprint analysis. For rural residents, advanced heat supply technology for heating system is the best solving method for now. For urban residents, carbon footprint can be reduced from the following two aspects: first, adjust industrial structure and energy structure and improve the utilization ratio of energy; second, try to guide residents to a healthy consumption pattern. |
| |
| Keywords: | Embodied carbon footprint Direct carbon footprint Input-output analysis Household consumption |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
