| 风能资源评估中地表粗糙度的研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李军,胡非,刘磊,王丙兰.风能资源评估中地表粗糙度的研究[J].资源科学,2011,33(12):2341-2348. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李军 胡非 刘磊 王丙兰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室,北京100029／中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
2. 中国科学院大气物理研究所大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室,北京,100029 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点项目(编号: 90715031)；国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号: 4077501)；中国气象局全国风能资源详查和评价项目数值模拟专项。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 利用内蒙东部草原接近1年4层风速廓线资料，采用最常用的两类方法（拟合对数风廓线法和Davenport土地类型系统划分法），结合风能资源利用的特点，来估算该地区地表粗糙度长度。选取10分钟平均风速50m高度大于6m／s时刻的数据，因为50m高度平均风速6m／s以下的时，轮毂高度为80m的风机只能产生少量不稳定的风能。这样挑选数据能够有效地减少粗糙度长度评估中的离散范围。拟合对数风廓线，发现该地区地表粗糙度长度有明显月份和季节变化，夏秋植被茂盛期和冬春植被枯萎期粗糙度长度分别为0．138m和0．088m；细微的地形起伏也会对粗糙度的评估造成影响。两类方法估算的粗糙度长度大致相当，且估算的风能密度只相差2％左右。Davenport法对比较平坦的地形进行粗糙度评估，具有一定的应用参考价值。
|
| 关 键 词： | 风能资源评估 粗糙度长度 风廓线 土地类型 |
On Estimation of Surface Roughness for Wind Energy Resources Assessment |
| |
| LI Jun,HU Fei,LIU Lei and WANG Binglan.On Estimation of Surface Roughness for Wind Energy Resources Assessment[J].Resources Science,2011,33(12):2341-2348. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jun HU Fei LIU Lei and WANG Binglan |
| |
| Institution: | State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
| |
| Abstract: | There are two commonly used techniques, i.e., fitting to logarithmic wind profile and the Davenport roughness classification system, in wind energy resources assessment, which were used for evaluation of surface aerodynamics roughness length of a steppe in Inner Mongolia. It was expected that the grassland location would have roughness lengths between the Davenport classes of the Fifth (0.25 m) to the Third (0.03 m). Data, collected from May 21, 2009 through May 14, 2010 and measured by cup anemometers and wind vanes (1Hz) deployed at four levels (10, 30, 50 and 70 meters above the ground), were analyzed. If one of the levels had missing data for a time period, all records from that time period were removed from the analysis. Then, original data were averaged over 10 minute intervals. Time periods with wind speed at 50 m height or above 6 m/s, were chosen for further analysis, which was because if wind speed at 50 m height is under 6 m/s, most large turbines would generate little usable power. This approach is useful for wind resource assessment in the absence of stability calculation and can largely reduce errors of calculation of roughness length. Ten-minute averaged wind profiles were classified into categories of twelve directions. The liner least-squares method was used to fit the averaged logarithmic wind profiles. It was found that the roughness length had monthly and seasonal variations. In summer-fall months when grass was lush, the average roughness length was measured to be 0.138 m and in winter-spring months when grass was shriveled, it was measured to be 0.088 m. The minimum value of the monthly-average roughness length was 0.041 m appearing in January of 2010, which may have reflected that the land was covered by snow. The hourly-average roughness lengths showed a diurnal variation, with the maximum value occurring at midnight and the minimum value at noon. The roughness lengths computed based on southwest and west wind measurements were also shown to be larger than these computed based on northeast and north wind measurements in all time periods. Minor topography changes could influence the roughness lengths. The higher topography, despite being several kilometers far away from tower, was shown to impact the roughness lengths. In general, the magnitude of roughness lengths calculated from the two techniques seems to be consistent. To estimate wind power densities, we extrapolated a 10 m/s wind speed at 50 m to an 80 m hub height and used the estimated roughness lengths based on above two techniques. Difference in estimated roughness length between the two techniques is about 2%, which means that the Davenport roughness classification system appears to be a practical method to estimate roughness length for flat terrain with moderated roughness. |
| |
| Keywords: | Wind energy resources assessment Roughness length Logarithmic wind profile Grassland |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
