首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

教师专业标准比较研究及启示--以中国、澳大利亚为例
引用本文:刘颂迪.教师专业标准比较研究及启示--以中国、澳大利亚为例[J].继续教育研究,2021(1):80-85.
作者姓名:刘颂迪
作者单位:云南师范大学 教育学部,云南 昆明 650500
基金项目:2019年度云南省哲学社会科学研究基地(重点)项目"云南高校教师社会兼职兼薪行为调查与治理对策研究"
摘    要:教师质量是影响教育质量的重要因素,因此严格教师的资质对于教师队伍的培养至关重要,并在当今受到了世界各国的广泛重视。推动教师专业发展、提高教师队伍素质已经受到世界教师教育改革的共同关注。以2012年中国颁布的《幼儿园教师专业标准(试行)》《小学教师专业标准(试行)》《中学教师专业标准(试行)》以及澳大利亚颁布的《全国教师专业标准(2011年版)》为研究对象,通过比较分析,借此探求不同教师专业标准异同,为进一步完善我国现行教师专业标准提供参考和借鉴。

关 键 词:教师专业标准  比较研究  启示

Comparative Study and Enlightenment of Teachers’ Professional Standards ——Taking China and Australia as an Example
Liu Songdi.Comparative Study and Enlightenment of Teachers’ Professional Standards ——Taking China and Australia as an Example[J].Continue Education Research,2021(1):80-85.
Authors:Liu Songdi
Institution:(Department of Education,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500,China)
Abstract:The quality of teachers is an important factor affecting the quality of education,so strict teachers’qualification is very important to the training of teachers,and has been widely valued by all countries in the world.Promoting the professional development of teachers and improving the quality of teachers has been paid common attention by the reform of teacher education in the world.With the“Professional Standards for Kindergarten Teachers(Trials)”promulgated in China in 2012,Professional Standards for Primary School Teachers(Trial),Professional Standards for Secondary School Teachers(Trial)and the National Teacher Professional Standards(2011 Edition)promulgated by Australia as research objects,through comparative analysis,this paper aims to explore the similarities and differences between different teachers’professional standards,and to provide reference for further improving the current professional standards of teachers in China.
Keywords:Teachers’Professional Standards  Comparative Studies  Enlightenment
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号