| 民事诉讼法律关系理论的三个缺陷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨柳青.民事诉讼法律关系理论的三个缺陷[J].四川师范学院学报,2011(3):48-51. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨柳青 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西华师范大学法学院,四川南充637009 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国现有的民事诉讼法律关系理论存在三个缺陷：一是对民事诉讼法律关系的诸多定义普遍对民事诉讼法律关系的主体和内容涵盖不全。民事诉讼法律关系宜界定为：受民事诉讼法调整而在任何两个参与民事诉讼的主体之间形成的、以诉讼权利义务为内容的社会关系。这里的主体除通说认可的外,还应包括审判委员会、法官、检察官、旁听人,再修订《民事诉讼法》后审判委员会不应再包括进去。二是＂诉讼参与人＂和＂诉讼参加人＂在《民事诉讼法》中的区别不当,导致概念之间容易含混不清,这未引起足够重视。三是其他诉讼参与人同当事人之间的民事诉讼法律关系称为争讼法律关系并不妥当,宜称为助诉法律关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民事诉讼法律关系 争讼法律关系 诉讼参与人 |
Three Defects in the Theories of Civil Procedure Law Relationship |
| |
| YANG Liu-qing.Three Defects in the Theories of Civil Procedure Law Relationship[J].Journal of Sichuan Teachers College (Philosophy & Social Science),2011(3):48-51. |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Liu-qing |
| |
| Institution: | YANG Liu-qing(School of Law,China West Normal University,Nanchong 637009,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | All the existing definitions of concept of civil procedure relationship have flaws such as improperly dismissing some subjects and contents of civil procedure relationship as a whole.In order to guide civil litigation better,the definitions of civil procedure relationship should be improved as follows： civil procedure relationship is a relationship between any two subjects whose behavior is regulated by the civil procedure law.In Chinese civil procedure regulations,＂participants in proleedings＂ and＂litigious interventors＂should be defined as two words having the same meanings,rather than two different concepts having different meanings.In Chinese regulations,＂participants in proceedings＂ should be replaced by＂litigious interventors＂.As a whole,the civil procedure relationship between parties and the other participants in proceedings shouldn＇t be called as competitive legal relationship. |
| |
| Keywords: | civil law relationship competitive legal relationship participants in proceedings |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
