| 戴震思想“分期说”评议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龙鑫.戴震思想“分期说”评议[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,30(6):85-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龙鑫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学哲学系,北京100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对戴震思想的“分期”研究由来已久，这一研究模式致力于戴震的早期与晚期之间划分出明确的界限，但其结果却形成了“考据学家戴震”与“义理学者戴震”两个难以兼容的形象，为我们理解其学问主旨造成了困难。“分期说”的主要缺陷是立论前提与论据使用的不当。唯有摆脱“分期说”，依照“通经以明道”这一贯穿戴震一生的学问路径，我们才能对戴震形成前后一贯的理解。
|
| 关 键 词： | 戴震思想 分期说 分裂 弥合 通经以明道 |
A Commentary on the Stage Division of DAI Zhen's Thought |
| |
| LONG Xin.A Commentary on the Stage Division of DAI Zhen's Thought[J].Journal of Xinyang Teachers College(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2010,30(6):85-91. |
| |
| Authors: | LONG Xin |
| |
| Institution: | LONG Xin ( Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The stage division＇of Dai Zhen＇s thought has been widely accepted. However, this argument placed great obstacles in compre- hending DAI Zhen＇s thought as a coherent system. In section I , the paper argues that the tlivision＇overemphasizes on the differences between Dai Zhen＇s thought in early years and in ＇afterlife, splits Dai Zhen into a philologist and a philosopher, and makes it impossible to comprehend his thought as a whole. The argument in section U shows that the ＂division＂ originated from the conflict between Han- learning and Sung-learning, and missed the consistence of his thought because of inappropriate evidences. In section Ⅲ, this paper in- tends to reveal the consistent topic of Dai Zhen＇s thought, that is to say, to reveal Dao through textual studies of Confucian canons. On- ly based on the study according to the proper text instead of ＂division＇can we comprehend Dai Zhen＇s thought as a coherent system rather than some ideas pieced together. |
| |
| Keywords: | DAI Zhen＇s thought division split coherence revealing Dao through textual studies |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
