| “妥协”至“共赢”——民元孙中山让位的背后 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁健.“妥协”至“共赢”——民元孙中山让位的背后[J].宜春师专学报,2008(1):119-123. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁健 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]华南师范大学历史文化学院,广东广州510631 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 孙中山让位是一个复杂的历史问题，从表面上看就是政权的交接那么简单，而实际上是在当时复杂历史环境下，多种因素相互交织、运作的结果。它本身蕴含了历史的诸多面相，这些诸多面相的背后凸显四个主要特征：一是妥协性，即清袁孙之间的妥协；二是助产性，即帝国主义和立宪派起了助产或催生的作用；三是和平性，即无论是清帝退位，还是孙中山让位，权力的交接过程都没有发生大规模大范围的战斗；四是共赢性，指清、袁、孙、帝国主义、立宪派都从中获得益处。民元让位过程所体现出的妥协性、助产性、和平性、共赢性，是一个完整的统一体．相互联系不可分割。
|
| 关 键 词： | 妥协 助产 和平 共赢 |
Compromise to Winning totally --behind Sun Yat- sen＇s Abdication in 1912 |
| |
| Authors: | DING Jian |
| |
| Institution: | DING Jian (South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Sun Yat - sen abdication was a complicated historical problem, in surface ,it was a political power to hand over Simply, But in fact, it was the result of various factors intertexture in the complicated history environment actually at that time , It contained four main characteristics： Compromise, the compromise ammong the Qing Royal House, Yuan Shikai and Sun Yat- sen; Promote, the imperialistic and the constitute parties had an effect function promoting in the abdication ; Pace, the power handing over to connect pacefully ; Winning totally, the Qing Royal House, Yuan Shikai, Sun Yat- sen, the imperialism, the constitute parties all acquired advantage from it. The history characters of Sun Yat- sen abdication were a unify body, contacting indivisibility mutually in 1912. |
| |
| Keywords: | compromise promote pace winning totally |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
