| 高校教师职务评聘中的法律问题探析--对一起诉讼案的法理学思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈鹏,祁占勇.高校教师职务评聘中的法律问题探析--对一起诉讼案的法理学思考[J].高等教育研究,2004,25(2):46-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈鹏 祁占勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中科技大学,教育科学研究院,湖北,武汉,430074;陕西师范大学,教育科学学院,陕西,西安,710062 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从林某诉某大学案的审理和分析中,可以得出以下结论:高校是"法律法规授权组织",具有行政主体资格,相应被纳入行政诉讼制度的监督范围;司法审查的有限介入是必要的,而不是对学术自由的干预;教师职务授予行为的主体不是学校的教师职务评审委员会,而是学校;"评"与"聘"是两个相对独立的行为过程,前者是一种行政行为,后者是一种民事行为。
|
| 关 键 词： | 高等学校 司法审查 学术自由 职务评定 职务聘任 |
The analysis of the juristic issues related to the evaluation and engagement of faculty |
| |
| CHEN Peng,QI Zhan-yong.The analysis of the juristic issues related to the evaluation and engagement of faculty[J].Journal of Higher Education,2004,25(2):46-50. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Peng QI Zhan-yong |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Peng~1,QI Zhan-yong~2 |
| |
| Abstract: | From the cognizance and analysis of Lin's prosecution against a certain university, a conclusion can be drawn that an university is a law granted organization who has the administrative entity, and correspondingly it would be assimilated into the supervising scope of administrative litigant system,and the limited intervention of juristic examination is needed, instead of intervention of the academic liberty. The main body of the organization which grants the faculties ranking titles is not the school's Teaching Ranking Evaluation Committee but the school itself, and "Evaluation" and "Engagement" are two independent process of behavior, the former is a administrative behavior while the later is a civil behavior. |
| |
| Keywords: | college and university judicial censor academic freedom the ranking of teaching tile the engagement of the duty |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
