科学合理性的二难困境对辩证法的回应 |
| |
引用本文: | 李才华,童鹰.科学合理性的二难困境对辩证法的回应[J].青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(6):68-72. |
| |
作者姓名: | 李才华 童鹰 |
| |
作者单位: | 武汉大学,哲学系,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
摘 要: | 从科学的证实主义、证伪主义以及舍弃证实与证伪方法的非理性主义、新历史主义各流派都面临着二难困境,主要是由于科学哲学家选择科学合理性解释模式的单一化造成的,若用辩证观点来理解证实和证 伪、历史和逻辑、价值和理性之间的互补互斥的多元关系具有巨大的优越性。
|
关 键 词: | 科学合理性 逻辑 历史 非理性 |
文章编号: | 1000-5102(2003)06-0068-05 |
修稿时间: | 2003年6月19日 |
Difficulty Of Science And Dialectics |
| |
Abstract: | The article tried to demonstrate that the principle of falsification and logical positivism had trapped into disadvantage position because the ability of cognition is limited within a small range .Though historicism provided all sorts of science development .They were involved into relativism and non-ration. We can find that science logical is not perfect and that the relation between the positivism and the falsification is dialectics, so is the relation between history and logical. |
| |
Keywords: | science rationality logic history non-rationality |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|