| 论行政自由裁量权的听证程序规制 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋午子,陈永富.论行政自由裁量权的听证程序规制[J].阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版),2010(6):102-105. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋午子 陈永富 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江农林大学人文学院,浙江,临安,311300 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 社会主义法治理念确立了法律至上的原则,法律位于权力之上,与此同时在行政法的理论与实践中,行政主体在执法过程中拥有的自由裁量的权力,往往会出现超越行政职权,违反法定程序的问题,甚至会出现严重偏离法律自身的真实意图,出现权力凌驾于法律之上的情形。本文从行政执法主体行使裁量权方面分析其存在的必然性,进而从程序工具价值以及程序本体价值方面入手对构建程序规制的必要性进行分析,最后提出构建切实有效的行政听证程序来监督制约自由裁量权的不适当行使。
|
| 关 键 词： | 自由裁量权 程序价值 听证程序 规制 |
On the Administrative Discretion of the Hearing Procedure Regulation |
| |
| SONG Wu-zi,CHEN Yong-fu.On the Administrative Discretion of the Hearing Procedure Regulation[J].Journal of Fuyang Teachers College(Social Science Edition),2010(6):102-105. |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Wu-zi CHEN Yong-fu |
| |
| Institution: | SONG Wu-zi,CHEN Yong-fu(Humanity College,Zhejiang Agriculture Forest University,Zhejiang Lin'an 311300) |
| |
| Abstract: | Socialist concept of law establishes the principle of supremacy of law,the legal authority over at the same time in theory and practice of administrative law,administrative principal in the law enforcement process has discretionary powers,often beyond the administrative functions will appear,contrary to statutory procedures,even seriously deviate from the true intentions of the law itself,a power situation above the law.In this article,the exercise of discretion from the executive body and the right of the ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Discretion Program value Hearing Procedure Regulation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
