| 博士学位论文双盲评阅风险分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 武小悦.博士学位论文双盲评阅风险分析[J].高等教育研究学报,2014(3):47-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 武小悦 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国防科学技术大学信息系统与管理学院,湖南长沙,410073 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国防科学技术大学“十二五”研究生教育教学改革研究课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在现行博士学位论文评阅制度下,博士论文双盲评阅主要面临两类风险:一类是将合格的论文评审为不合格论文,另一类是将不合格论文评审为通过。基于专家评阅水平和博士学位论文的质量水平,建立了博士论文双盲评阅风险与评阅专家数量、评阅通过规则之间的关系模型。最后,通过运用模型进行计算分析,得出了不同假设情况下两类风险水平的变化规律。
|
| 关 键 词： | 博士学位论文 评阅 双盲 风险分析 |
Risk Analysis for Double-Blind Review of Doctoral Dissertation |
| |
| WU Xiao-yue.Risk Analysis for Double-Blind Review of Doctoral Dissertation[J].Journal of Higher Education Research,2014(3):47-50. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Xiao-yue |
| |
| Institution: | WU Xiao - yue ( College of Information System ＆ Management, NUDT, Changsha 410073, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Under current peer review mechanism for doctoral dissertation, two main risk types exist ： one is the risk that a qualified dissertation is judged as unqualified. Another is that an unqualified dissertation is judged as qualified. In this paper, based on the quality level of expert review and the doctoral dissertation, a model is built for analyzing the relationship between the double - blind review risk, and the number of reviewing experts, rules for passing review. Finally, by numerical computation using the model, the risk level change of the two types of risk are obtained under different hypothesis conditions. |
| |
| Keywords: | undergraduate curriculum system management engineering Comprehensiveuniversity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
