| Abstract: | Earlier (Wainer & Lewis, 1990), we reported the initial development of a testlet-based algebra test. In this account, we provide the details of this excursion into the use of testlets. A pretest of two 15–item algebra tests was carried out in which examinees' performance on a 4-item subset of each test (a 4–item testlet) was used to predict performance on the entire test. Two models for constructing the testlets were considered: hierarchical (adaptive) and linear (fixed format). These models are compared with each other. It was found on cross–validation that, although an adaptive testlet is superior to a fixed format testlet, this superiority is modest, whereas the potential cost of that superiority is considerable. It was concluded that in circumstances similar to those we report a fixed format testlet that uses the best items in a pool can do almost as well as the optimal adaptive testlet of equal length from that same pool. |
