| 为巨额财产来源不明罪正名 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 江学,罗琦.为巨额财产来源不明罪正名[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2002,16(6):56-59. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 江学 罗琦 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉大学,法学院,湖北武汉,430072
2. 中南财经政法大学,法学院,湖北武汉,430073 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 巨额财产来源不明罪在证明责任上并没有实行倒置，证明责任仍是由控制方承担，有些观点混淆了辨护权的行使与证明责任的负担。立罚并不存在有罪推定问题，更无从论及对无罪推定原则的背反。认为该罪属于有罪推定，且有违无罪推定原则的观点是将事实推定等同于推定犯罪，有罪推定，而且未能认清本罪的犯罪构成，对本罪的特性亦缺乏了解。
|
| 关 键 词： | 巨额财产来源不明罪 证明责任 无罪推定 推定犯罪 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-7023(2002)06-0056-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年3月20日 |
The Recovery of Reputation of the Crime of Enormous Property Without Lawful Sources |
| |
| JIANG Xue ,LUO Qi.The Recovery of Reputation of the Crime of Enormous Property Without Lawful Sources[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2002,16(6):56-59. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Xue LUO Qi |
| |
| Institution: | JIANG Xue 1,LUO Qi 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | There is no inversion on the burden of proof for the crime of enormous property without lawful sources, the burden of proof is still assumed by the persecution. Some scholars failed to differ defence from the burden of proof. This crime is not the presumption of crime, and doesn't break the principle of presumption of innocence. The arguments regarded the presumption of fact as constructive crime and the presumption of crime, but also failed to understand the constitution of the crime, and misunderstanded the characteristic of the crime. |
| |
| Keywords: | the crime of enormous property without lawful sources burden of proof presumption of innocence constructive crime |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
