| 高水平组与低水平组英语学习策略的差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高琼.高水平组与低水平组英语学习策略的差异[J].四川教育学院学报,2009,25(5):98-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高琼 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宜春学院,外国语学院,江西,宜春,336000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本研究运用问卷调查与访谈相结合的方法,以大学入学新生为对象研究了高低水平学生英语学习策略的差异。研究结果显示：（1）就均值而言,高水平组在总体策略层面和六类策略的使用频率都高于低水平组。（2）T检验结果表明,除补偿策略外,两组学生在认知策略、元认知策略、记忆策略、社交策略和情感策略的使用差异达到统计上的显著差异性。（3）在单项策略层面上,卡方经验结果显示22个项目存在显著的组间差异,低水平组错误的学习信念阻碍了学习策略的有效运用。最后就大学阶段的英语策略教学提出了几点建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 新生 学习策略 英语水平 大学 |
Strategic Difference in English Learning by Proficiency Level |
| |
| GAO Qiong.Strategic Difference in English Learning by Proficiency Level[J].Journal of Sichuan College of Education,2009,25(5):98-101. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Qiong |
| |
| Institution: | GAO Qiong ( Foreign Language School, Yichun University, Yichun Jiangxi 336000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The article reports on an investigation of strategic differences in English learning between high-proficiency group and low-proficiency one among university entrants.The results show that： 1） In terms of frequency mean,high-proficiency group surpasses its counterpart at overall level and at category level.2） The t-test yields significant differences in cognitive strategies,meta-cognitive strategies,memory strategies,social strategies and affective strategies,all favoring high-proficiency group.3）The chi-square test also displays significant strategic differences with 22 individual items between the two groups,all disliked by low-proficiency group,the reason being their incorrect beliefs on English learning.Several suggestions are offered in the end on English strategy training at college level,especially with university entrants. |
| |
| Keywords: | university entrants learning strategies English proficiency level university |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
