| 实用艺术品的可版权性及其独创性判断——“玩具汽车底座”著作权侵权案引发的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王灿红.实用艺术品的可版权性及其独创性判断——“玩具汽车底座”著作权侵权案引发的思考[J].广东广播电视大学学报,2012,21(4):47-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王灿红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 汕头广播电视大学,广东汕头,515041 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 虽然《著作权法》并未列举出用实用艺术品这一作品形式，但不能因此当然排除对这类作品的保护。《著作权法》和《伯尔尼公约》并未将实用艺术作品排斥在保护范围之外，如果能从实用艺术品中抽象地分离出受著作权法保护的思想表达，当这种表达具有可选择性、美感和独创性时，就可以判断这件产品具有可版权性，能纳入著作权的保护范围。
|
| 关 键 词： | 实用艺术品 可版权性 保护标准 |
On the Conclusion of Copyright and Unique Artistry of the Works of Applied Art--Reflections on the ＂Toy Car Base＂ Copyright Infringement Case |
| |
| WANG Can-hong.On the Conclusion of Copyright and Unique Artistry of the Works of Applied Art--Reflections on the ＂Toy Car Base＂ Copyright Infringement Case[J].Journal of Guangdong Radio & Television University,2012,21(4):47-50. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Can-hong |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Can-hong(Shantou Radio and University,Shantou,Guangdong,China,515041) |
| |
| Abstract: | Though the Copy Right Law doesn’t state clearly whether works of applied art should be protected,works of this kind should not be excluded from protection because the Copy Right Law and the Berne Convention don’t exclude them in terms of their protection.If the ideas and thoughts conveyed in the works of applied art can be separated from the works themselves and their expressions bear the features of selectivity,aesthetics and artistry uniqueness,the works can be concluded to have the copy right and be listed among the objects protected by the copy right. |
| |
| Keywords: | works of applied art copyright protection standards |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
