Teacher perceptions of integrating technology in writing |
| |
| Authors: | Kelley Regan Anya S Evmenova Donna Sacco Jessica Schwartzer David S Chirinos Melissa D Hughes |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Division of Special Education and disAbility Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA;2. Department of Special Education and Child Development, University of North Carolina in Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA;3. Department of Psychological Science, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | With increasing emphasis by policymakers, there has been an increase in access to technology within schools across the globe. However, recent survey findings suggest that teachers may not be integrating technology into their writing instruction in meaningful and effective ways. Variability in technology integration can be attributed to teacher attitudes about technology. This study seeks to understand teacher attitudes and perceptions regarding writing instruction and use of technology. Interviews of 47 middle school teachers revealed that most teachers considered themselves to be technology users who perceived their students’ writing skills to be deficient, yet spent little time on writing instruction in content areas. Teachers indicated that barriers to using technology included that it was too time-consuming; they had limited access; and they perceived access to be a competition. However, teachers revealed that technology was positive for students with disabilities, differentiating instruction, and providing twenty-first-century learning opportunities. These findings suggest that teacher attitudes and perceptions play an important role in technology integration. In addition to increased access to technology, school divisions should provide pre-service and in-service training and time for reflection so that teacher attitudes that impede technology integration can be positively manipulated to improve technology integration in the classroom. |
| |
| Keywords: | Integrating technology writing instruction teacher perceptions |
|
|
