| 民事诉讼中的鉴定制度刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢开凯.民事诉讼中的鉴定制度刍议[J].湘南学院学报,2004,25(1):24-27. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢开凯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南天夫律师事务所,湖南,郴州,423000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 民事诉讼中的鉴定制度涉及鉴定人、鉴定客体和鉴定结论等基本内容,对于鉴定人的设置,我国目前只承认法人享有鉴定权。在审判实践中,普遍存在以鉴定机构的级别高低来决定鉴定结论所具有的证据效力的强弱与取舍,这既不符合确定证据的客观事实标准,在适用上也于法无据,为此对我国现行鉴定制度的改革已迫在眉睫。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民事诉讼 鉴定制度 改革 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-8173(2004)01-0024-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年10月14 |
Discussion of the Authentication System in Common Pleas |
| |
| XIE Kai-kai.Discussion of the Authentication System in Common Pleas[J].Journal of Xiangnan University,2004,25(1):24-27. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Kai-kai |
| |
| Abstract: | As to the setting of authenticator, in the basic contents such as the authentication system in common pleas, authenticator, subject of authentication and authentication conclusion, the present law in our country only acknowledges that a legal person has the authentication right. In trial practice, it is universal to judge the validity of an authentication conclusion according to the level of the authenticating organization that makes the authentication, hence to decide whether it can be accepted or rejected, which not only fails to meet the objective standard of confirming proofs, but also is illegal. It is therefore to carry out reforms of the authentication system in our country. |
| |
| Keywords: | common pleas authentication system reform |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
