| 和而不同:教育史学与比较教育学辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李文英,田山俊.和而不同:教育史学与比较教育学辨析[J].教育研究,2012(5):17-21,47. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李文英 田山俊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河北大学教育学院国际与比较教育研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 教育史学科和比较教育学科是两个关系极为密切的学科。虽然两门学科在学科性质、研究目的、研究对象、研究内容、研究方法、研究时间维度上差异显著,但也存在着许多交叉之处。厘清教育史学科与比较教育学科的关系,探讨二者的联系和区别,对深入认识两个学科和加强基础理论研究具有重要意义。教育史学和比较教育学既应彼此借鉴研究方法,加强科际交流,同时又要创新研究范式,彰显学科特色。
|
| 关 键 词： | 教育史学 比较教育学 研究范式 |
Harmony in Diversity:Discrimination on Historiography of Education and Comparative Education |
| |
| Li Wenying & Tian Shanjun.Harmony in Diversity:Discrimination on Historiography of Education and Comparative Education[J].Educational Research,2012(5):17-21,47. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Wenying & Tian Shanjun |
| |
| Institution: | Li Wenying & Tian Shanjun,Director,professor and doctoral supervisor of Institute of International and Comparative Education Research,School of Education,Hebei University(Baoding 071002);Ph.D.of Center for Local University Education Research of China,Inner Mongolia University(Hohhot 010021) |
| |
| Abstract: | Historiography of education and comparative education are the two disciplines with extremely close relationship.Although the two disciplines are notably different in the nature of discipline,research objective,research object,research content,research method,and research time dimension,there are many intersections between them.To clarify the relationship between historiography of education and comparative education,it is of great significance to deeply recognize the two disciplines and strengthen the basic theoretical research so as to explore their relations and differences.Historiography of education and comparative education should not only borrow research methods from each other,and reinforce the communications between them,but also innovate the research paradigm and highlight disciplinary characteristics. |
| |
| Keywords: | historiography of education comparative education research paradigm |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
