| 从对《德国民法典》第90a条的理解展开环境资源法学与民法学的对话 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蔡守秋.从对《德国民法典》第90a条的理解展开环境资源法学与民法学的对话[J].南阳师范学院学报,2006,5(4):1-15. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蔡守秋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,环境法研究所,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 新修订的《德国民法典》关于“动物不是物”的规定,是指动物既不是物,也不是人,动物就是动物。这一规定是民法(特别是大陆法系的民法)发展史上具有里程碑性质的重大变革,它宣布了当代民法的一种新理念,是对传统民法理论中“人、物二分法”、“主、客二分法”的研究范式的突破。“主、客二分法”在法学中的经典表现是,世界仅由人与物组成,不是人就是物,不是物就是人,人永远是主体,物永远是客体。这种“主、客二分法”有许多弊病。环境资源法学主张“主、客一体化”,“动物不是民法中的物,也不是民法中的人”的观点一直是环境资源法学的基本观点之一。动物既区别于人又区别于物,法律可以确认动物享有权利,但动物权利不是人权,享有权利的动物也不是人。
|
| 关 键 词： | 环境资源法学 民法学 “主、客二分法” 动物不是物 动物的权利 德国民法典 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-6132（2006）04-0001-15 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-03-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年3月8日 |
Promoting the Communion of Environment and Resources Law with Civil Law Based on the Comprehension of the Number Ninety a Item in the German Civil Code |
| |
| CAI Shou-qiu.Promoting the Communion of Environment and Resources Law with Civil Law Based on the Comprehension of the Number Ninety a Item in the German Civil Code[J].Journal of Nanyang Teachers College,2006,5(4):1-15. |
| |
| Authors: | CAI Shou-qiu |
| |
| Abstract: | The stipulation that "animals are not things "in the newly revised German Civil Code points out that animals are neither things nor men, and they are just animals.The legislation has now brought about a milestone-like reform in the history of civil law, especially for the civil law of the continental law system.It declares a fresh notion of modern civil law and makes a breakthrough of the "man-thing dichotomy "paradigm and the "subject-object dichotomy "paradigm in the traditional civil law theory.The classical manifestation of the "subject-object dichotomy"paradigm is that the whole world is only composed of humans and things, the matter is sure to be a man if it is not a thing and vice versa,men are always subjects and things are forever objects.There exist many disadvantages in the "subject-object dichotomy"paradigm.The theory of environment and resources law holds the "subject-object integration "paradigm.The idea that "animals are neither things nor men in civil law" forms the fundamental opinions of the environment and resources law.Animals, as distinct from both men and things, can be awarded legal rights.The rights of animals aren't identical to human rights of animals, the animals nor are equale to men. |
| |
| Keywords: | environment and resources law civil law "Subject-object dichotomy "paradigm animals are not things the rights of animals the German Civil Code |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
