Evaluation of retirement planning programs: A qualitative analysis of methodologies and efficacy |
| |
| Authors: | Cristineide Leandro-França Sheila Giardini Murta Douglas A Hershey Leonardo Barbosa Martins |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Post-Graduation Program in Clinical Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazilcristineide@unb.br;3. Post-Graduation Program in Clinical Psychology, Psychology Institute, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil;4. Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACTThe objective of this integrative literature review was to evaluate the quality of retirement planning programs described in the extant literature. This was accomplished through a qualitative analysis of methodological and efficacy criteria as described by Flay et al. (2005), Kazdin (2010, 2011 and Murta (2005). Several databases were consulted in searching for retirement program articles including: Academic Search Premier, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science, among others. Retirement planning intervention articles published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish were considered, with a focus on their evaluation methods and results. Eleven studies were identified that described the procedures for both program implementation and intervention evaluation. Results revealed methodological shortcomings in the papers reviewed, with concerns being related to a lack of experimental or quasiexperimental approaches, a failure to use previously validated measurement instruments and longitudinal assessments, and insufficiently robust data analysis procedures. That said, however, there was evidence from multiple investigations that the intervention programs examined led to increases in knowledge, positive changes in attitudes linked to retirement, and an increase in retirement-linked planning and preparation behaviors. Identification of strengths and weaknesses in the methods used and efficacy of these interventions could facilitate the construction of a research agenda aimed at promoting more favorable research designs. Use of more rigorous designs would stand to improve the internal validity of these retirement programs and, consequently, progress in this field. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
