首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“‘所’是‘以’的宾语”质疑
引用本文:王兴才.“‘所’是‘以’的宾语”质疑[J].四川三峡学院学报,2013(6):104-109.
作者姓名:王兴才
作者单位:重庆三峡学院文学与新闻学院,重庆万州404100
基金项目:重庆三峡学院科研项目(项目编号11ZD-04;12ZZ44)阶段性成果
摘    要:学术界一般认为,“所以VP”中“所”是“以”的宾语,并且有学者主张,这种结构中“所以”是介宾词组,其充当VP的方式状语。文章通过对“所以VP”的考察认为,“以”的宾语并非其前的“所”,而应是“以+(之)+VP”中的“之”。在“以+(之)+VP”前通过添加标记词“所”而使其仂语化的过程中,为了避免重复或因为人们皆明白“之”之所指,因而也就隐含了“之”。“所以(之)VP”具有名词性,“所以”也具有名词性。“所以”不是“介+宾”结构,而是一种跨层次间的句法组合。

关 键 词:“所以VP”  “所以”  “介+宾”结构  质疑

"Suo(所)' Is the Object of 'Yi(以)'" Questioned
Institution:WANG X i ngca i (School of Literature and Journalism, Chongqing Three Georges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing 404100)
Abstract:It is widely accepted in academic circle that 'Suo(所)' is the Object of 'Yi(以) in "Suoyi(所以)"+VP construction, and some scholars even hold that "suoyi (所以 )" is a "preposition+object" construction and is the manner adverbial of VP. With investigation, this paper states that in this construction, the object of "yi (以 ) " is not "suo(所)" before itself, but "zhi(之)" in the construction of" 'yi(以)'+ (zhi之)) +VP". This phrase is made by the addition of the marker "suo (所) ". In order to avoid repetition or because the reference of "zhi (之) "is known to all, "zhi(之)" is thus hidden. The construction of "suoyi(zhi) VP" is nouny in nature and so is "suoyi", and "suoyi" is not a "preposition +object construction", but is formed by crossing syntactic layers.
Keywords:"suoyi+VP"  "suoyi'  "preposition+object" costruction  questioned
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号