| 试析课程编制过程中的落差——现象学视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹培英.试析课程编制过程中的落差——现象学视角[J].课程.教材.教法,2011(11). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹培英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海市静安区教育学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部重点课题(课题号:DHA080092)”提高中小学生学业效能:‘轻负担、高质量'的实证研究”成果之一 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 学生课业负担的许多客观事实显示,课程编制过程中存在着两级落差。从改革初衷到课程标准的第一级落差,主源自各自追求本学科可能发展区间的最大化以及总体协商、调控机制的缺乏;从课程标准到教科书的第二级落差,主源自某些标准的引申、充实、拓展失度,目标把握失当,教材都挤内容拓展一条道。控制落差的主对策是:降低课程编制的决策风险,加强实证研究,改进与完善评估机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 课程编制 落差 课业负担 决策风险 实证研究 调控机制 |
Analysis of the Gap in the Process of Curriculum Development from the Perspective of Phenomenology |
| |
| CAO Pei-ying.Analysis of the Gap in the Process of Curriculum Development from the Perspective of Phenomenology[J].Curriculum; Teaching Material and Method,2011(11). |
| |
| Authors: | CAO Pei-ying |
| |
| Institution: | CAO Pei-ying (Educational Institute of Jing'an District,Shanghai 200040,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Some real facets of the burden of students'schoolwork illustrate that there exist two levels of undiscovered gap in the process of curriculum development.The first level of gap,from the original intention of reform to curriculum standards,derives from various disciplines' pursuit of maximum of development space,as well as the lack of mechanisms of overall negotiating and adjusting;the second levels of gap,from curriculum standards to textbooks,mainly derives from the extension, enrichment,inappropriate deve... |
| |
| Keywords: | curriculum development gap schoolwork burden decision risk empirical research mechanism of regulation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
