| 探析对赌协议在司法实践中的运用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 葛立娟.探析对赌协议在司法实践中的运用[J].巢湖学院学报,2016(4):24-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 葛立娟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽大学,安徽 合肥,230601 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对赌协议在我国司法实践中仍处于尴尬境地，通过对司法审判中的对赌协议案例的统计和分析，发现实践中存在着定义不明确和界定错误的问题。法院大多依据合同法认定对赌协议有效，当事人依据公司法、金融法、合同法和司法判例主张对赌协议无效，各有欠缺之处。通过对理论和实践的反思，认为应当结合国际视角加深研究，并加快立法以填补法律空白，同时必须加强风险监管。
|
| 关 键 词： | 对赌协议 私募股权 风险共担原则 估值 |
A STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF VALUATION ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM IN JURIDICAL PRACTICE |
| |
| Abstract: | Valuation Adjustment Mechanism(VAM) in our country’s judicial practice is still in dilemma. Through the statistics and analysis of the VAM in judicial cases, we can find that there are problems of unclear or false definition. The court will rec-ognize the validity of VAM according to contract law, however, the parties will be against according to corporation law, financial law, contract law and judicial precedent. Both of them have shortcomings. Through the reflection of the theory and practice, the writer of the thesis think we should combine with international perspectives to deepen the study and speed up legislation to fill the blank of the law, in the meantime, we must strengthen the supervision of the risk. |
| |
| Keywords: | Valuation adjustment mechanism Private equity The principle of risk-sharing Estimation value |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
