| 《招魂》《大招》论析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙振田.《招魂》《大招》论析[J].淮南师范学院学报,2008,10(1):60-63. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙振田 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学,文学院,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 二《招》（《招魂》《大招》）所招为屈原魂而非楚怀王魂（或其他楚王魂）；二《招》为抒情言志之作，而非所谓实用的招魂辞；《招魂》以生活招，《大招》以政治图景招，《招魂》主要着眼于“己”，《大招》则更多着眼于“朝”；二《招》采取幻设以讽刺、对比以讽刺的手法，具体各不相同；二《招》寄意遥深，委婉曲折，与屈原正道直言截然不同。二《招》的思想与艺术价值应该得到新的认识与发掘。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《招魂》 《大招》 抒情言志 政治图景 讽刺艺术 |
On some questions about Zhao hun and Da zhao |
| |
| SUN Zhen-tian.On some questions about Zhao hun and Da zhao[J].Journal of Huainan Teachers College,2008,10(1):60-63. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Zhen-tian |
| |
| Institution: | SUN Zhen-tian |
| |
| Abstract: | Zhaohun and Da zhao are artistic works for expressing feelings and will not practical writings. The souls are Qu Yuan's not Chu Wang's in Zhaohun and Da zhao. Zhaohun calls Qu Yuan's soul by the life and Da zhao by the political prospect. If Zhaohun mainly focuses to Qu Yuan himself, Da zhao then focuses to the court. Zhaohun and Da zhao fabricate a imaginary living prospect and a imaginary political prospect and contrast something to satirize, and they display the obvious difference concretely. Zhaohun and Da zhao are entirely different with Qu Yuan in expressing feelings and will because Zhaohun and Da zhao are mildly and indirectly but Qu Yuan is frankly and correctly. Zhaohun and Da zhao 's ideaistic and artistic values should be recognized and excavated again. |
| |
| Keywords: | Zhaohun Da zhao expressing feelings and will political prospect ideaistic and artistic values |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
