| 教师是谁?--与吴康宁教授的对话 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李长伟.教师是谁?--与吴康宁教授的对话[J].扬州大学学报(高教研究版),2004,8(3):3-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李长伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学,教育科学学院,江苏,南京,210097 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 吴康宁教授认为，教师所应且所能扮演的社会角色是“半支配阶层代言人半公共知识分子”。但是这种认定难免会产生以下四种困境：教师社会角色的应然取向与实然状态的混淆与危险，教师社会角色应然取向的暧昧与难为，对教师作为代言人的留恋和幻想，以及教师社会角色的的虚无。基于以上困境．教师的社会角色应当是基于自己的专业知识，从特殊走向普遍的公共知识分子。
|
| 关 键 词： | 教师 教师社会角色 公共知识分子 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8606(2004)03-0003-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月26日 |
Who Is the Teacher? |
| |
| LI Chang-wei.Who Is the Teacher?[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition),2004,8(3):3-6. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Chang-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | Professor Wu holds that the role the teacher should and can play is a mixture of the dominant-class spokesman and the public intellectual. However, this definition is likely to produce four predicaments. The first one is the confusion and danger of the deontic orientation and the real orientation of the teacher's social role. The second one is the vagueness and difficulty of the deontic orientation. The third one is the nostalgia and imagination of the teacher as the spokesman. The forth one is the nihility of the teacher's social role. In view of these predicaments, teacher's social role should be a public intellectual from narrow to general sense on the basis of his own expertise. |
| |
| Keywords: | teacher teacher's social role public intellectual |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
