| 道家文学与浪漫主义刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 史忠义.道家文学与浪漫主义刍议[J].上海师范大学学报(基础教育版),2002,31(4):50-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 史忠义 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院外文所,北京100000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本从发生学、题材学和诗学等方面对道家学和浪漫主义进行了比较研究。作认为,中国古代不曾发生过浪漫主义学运动;所谓庄子是中国古代浪漫主义理论家、屈原和李白是中国古代浪漫主义诗人的提法是一种牵强附会。而“现实主义和浪漫主义两大基本创作方法”其实是中西化碰撞中“写实与虚幻想象”两种写作手法的概念偏移。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道家文学 浪漫主义 写实主义 虚幻想象手法 创作方法 发生学 题材学 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-8634(2002)04-0050-(11) |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年4月10日 |
Reflection on Taoist Literature and Romanticism |
| |
| SHI Zhongyi.Reflection on Taoist Literature and Romanticism[J].Journal of Shanghai NOrmal University,2002,31(4):50-60. |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Zhongyi |
| |
| Abstract: | This essay makes a comparative study of the Taoist Literature and Romanticism from the historical, thematic and poetic points of view. The author maintains that there was no romantic literary movement in ancient China. Zhuangzi is said to be an ancient romantic theorist; Qu Yuan and Li Bai are reputed to be the romantic poets in ancient China. This opinion is not reasonable. And as a matter of fact, "Realism and Romanticism as the two basic creative methods" are a conception shift from the realistic and imaginative creative methods in the conflict between Chinese and Western cultures. |
| |
| Keywords: | Taoist Literature Romanticism Realism imaginative method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
