首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论英美法名义上的损害赔偿金
引用本文:李永军,刘德志.论英美法名义上的损害赔偿金[J].聊城师范学院学报,2010(4):57-60.
作者姓名:李永军  刘德志
作者单位:[1]聊城大学法学院,山东聊城252059 [2]聊城市东昌府区人民检察院,山东聊城252000
摘    要:作为英美侵权法体系中一项重要制度,名义上的损害赔偿金的适用前提是行为本身构成损害诉因。名义上的损害赔偿金大致适用于两种情况:一是受害人没有实际损失;二是不能证明具体损失。名义上的损害赔偿金不同于小额的实质赔偿金,并且有时可以与惩罚性损害赔偿金并用。名义上的损害赔偿金的功能是,证明原告的个人品质是值得信赖的,进而为原告确认权利,以及寻求败诉方承担诉讼成本。

关 键 词:侵权法  名义上的损害赔偿金  实质赔偿金  藐视性损害赔偿金

Study on Nominal Damages in Common Law System
LI Yong-jun,LIU De-zhi.Study on Nominal Damages in Common Law System[J].Journal of Liaocheng Teachers University,2010(4):57-60.
Authors:LI Yong-jun  LIU De-zhi
Institution:1. Law Shool, Liaocheng University , Liaocheng 252059,China; 2. People's Proeuratorate ,Liaocheng District, Liaocheng 252000, China)
Abstract:As an important rule of torts in common law system, nominal damages may be awarded against a defendant who has committed a tort which is actionable per se. There are two circumstances that nominal damages may be awarded, one is that no loss has been suffered by the claimant, the other is that the necessary evidence as to the specific loss is not given. Nominal damages is different from substantial minimum damages and is sometimes awarded coupling with punitive damages. The functions of nominal damages are for the confirmation of the plaintiff's individual reputation and of the right, and the provision of "a mere peg on which to hang costs".
Keywords:torts  nominal damages    substantial damages  contemptuous damages
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号