| 对欺诈性合同受欺诈方救济方式的反思——以交易标的物欺诈为中心 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张庆华.对欺诈性合同受欺诈方救济方式的反思——以交易标的物欺诈为中心[J].德州学院学报,2008,24(3):88-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张庆华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 德州学院政法系,山东德州,253023 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 欺诈性合同成立生效后，受欺诈方不但享有合同撤销权，而且享有违约责任请求权。这两种民事权利的行使将产生不同的法律后果，受欺诈方可以选择对自己较为有利的救济手段，而不要拘泥于传统的救济手段，即仅行使撤销权。追究对方违约责任能使损失赔偿范围增大，对受欺诈方利益的保护优于行使撤销权。
|
| 关 键 词： | 欺诈 可撤销合同 违约责任 |
An Introspection of the Relief Mode for the Injured Party in the Fraudulent Contract |
| |
| ZHANG Qing-hua.An Introspection of the Relief Mode for the Injured Party in the Fraudulent Contract[J].Journal of Dezhou University,2008,24(3):88-91. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Qing-hua |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Qing-hua(Politics , Law Department of Dezhou University,Dezhou Sh,ong 253023,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The damaged party cannot only rescind the contract,but also has the right to claim the responsibility of breach,when the other party made a contract with fraudulent intention.The right of cancellation and the right to claim the responsibility of breach are different civil rights,which can lead to different legal effects.The damaged party can choose a favorable remedial way to protect himself instead of using the traditional remedial method-applying the right of cancellation as the sole choice. |
| |
| Keywords: | fraudulent revocable contract the responsibility of breach |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
