Using Student Video Cases to Assess Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Engineering Teaching Responsiveness |
| |
| Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">Tejaswini?DalviEmail author Kristen?Wendell |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Center of Science and Mathematics in Context,University of Massachusetts,Boston,USA;2.Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach,Tufts University,Medford,USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Our study addresses the need for new approaches to prepare novice elementary teachers to teach both science and engineering, and for new tools to measure how well those approaches are working. This in particular would inform the teacher educators of the extent to which novice teachers are developing expertise in facilitating their students’ engineering design work. One important dimension to measure is novice teachers’ abilities to notice the substance of student thinking and to respond in productive ways. This teacher noticing is particularly important in science and engineering education, where students’ initial, idiosyncratic ideas and practices influence the likelihood that particular instructional strategies will help them learn. This paper describes evidence of validity and reliability for the Video Case Diagnosis (VCD) task, a new instrument for measuring pre-service elementary teachers’ engineering teaching responsiveness. To complete the VCD, participants view a 6-min video episode of children solving an engineering design problem, describe in writing what they notice about the students’ science ideas and engineering practices, and propose how a teacher could productively respond to the students. The rubric for scoring VCD responses allowed two independent scorers to achieve inter-rater reliability. Content analysis of the video episode, systematic review of literature on science and engineering practices, and solicitation of external expert educator responses establish content validity for VCD. Field test results with three different participant groups who have different levels of engineering education experience offer evidence of construct validity. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
