| 全球化与中国后学推进者的学术取向 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王岳川.全球化与中国后学推进者的学术取向[J].湖南城市学院学报,2001,22(5):1-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王岳川 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学 中文系,北京 100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 后现代主义在中国呈现出研究主体的复杂性.因研究者各自的价值归宿、精神取向、思想资源和学术意趣不同,造成了学界研究群体中观点的彼此对立或价值判断的多元并存状态,形成中国当代后学研究的多样化走向.在这种多元化中,对后现代主义的推进者的声音值得注意,比较有代表性的声音是张扬建设性后现代主义,强调从中心走向文化边缘,坚持后学理论思想探源性研究,关注形而上学的命运与后现代实在论问题等.
|
| 关 键 词： | 后学研究 建设性后现代主义 文化边缘 形而上学的命运 实在论 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-876(2001)05-0001-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年8月3日 |
Globalization and the Learning Choince of the Pushers on Post-modernism in China |
| |
| WANG Yue-chuan.Globalization and the Learning Choince of the Pushers on Post-modernism in China[J].Journal of Hunan City Univeristy,2001,22(5):1-6. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Yue-chuan |
| |
| Abstract: | Post-modernism sticks out its complication in China. Because of the different homes to return to,different spirital trend,different resources of thought and different learning interest of each researcher,the plural state existing in one circle has formed in viewpoints opposite to each other or value judgement among research groups in the learning field.Thus,the virified trend of contemporary post-modernism research formed.In such a plural situation,the voices of the pushers of post-modernism are worth paying attention to,the more representative voices are:Publicizing constructive post-modernism,stressing going to cultural edge from center,sticking to the surveying thought resources research of post-modernism theory,paying attention to the fate of nihilism and the positivism problems of post-modernism,etc. |
| |
| Keywords: | Research of post-modernism constructive post-modernism cultural edge the fate of nihilism positivism viewpoint |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
