首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论体育教学模式
引用本文:秦云兴.论体育教学模式[J].新乡师范高等专科学校学报,2002,16(2):60-63.
作者姓名:秦云兴
作者单位:新乡师范高等专科学校,体育系,河南新乡,453000
摘    要:比较研究了我国传统体育教学模式与创新性体育教学模式。结果表明 :传统体育教学模式的教学方法单一 ,以教为主 ,注重体育技能的培养与学生身体素质的提高 ;在教学过程中忽视了学生的主体作用与个性培养 ;而创新性体育教学模式在教学方法上呈现多元化的倾向 ,重视发挥学生学习的主动性 ,强调培养学生情感和个性等非认知因素。指出 ,传统体育教学模式并非一无可取 ,现代体育教学模式也并非完美无缺 ,二者都有其优点和局限性。在反思我国传统体育教学模式的同时 ,从当前素质教育的角度重新审视体育教学 ,应该对传统体育教学加以批判地继承 ,合理地扬弃。不能将体育教学单一化、公式化 ,固守一种教学模式 ,否定或排斥其他的教学模式

关 键 词:体育教学模式  教学模式比较  注入式教学  启发式教学
文章编号:1008-7613(2002)02-0060-04
修稿时间:2002年3月20日

A Discourse on P.E Teaching Method
QIN Yun,xing.A Discourse on P.E Teaching Method[J].Journal of Xinxiang Teachers College,2002,16(2):60-63.
Authors:QIN Yun  xing
Abstract:The comparison of research on traditional P.E teaching method and creative P.E teaching method in our country. The research shows that traditional P.E teaching method is monotomous. It draws attention to teaching and emphasizes on improving skills and physical quality. However, it ignores students' functions and cultivation of personalities. Creative P.E teaching method appears to be multiple, it attaches importance to bring students' initiatives into play, lays stress on training students' emotion, characters etc. pointing out that neither traditional P.E teaching method is worthless, nor modern P.E teaching method is perfect. Each has both advantages and disadvantages. While thinking about the former, we should view P.E teaching from a different angle based on the present quality education. An we should inherit traditional P.E teaching critically. In a word, we can't make P.E teaching single and formulistic, or just use one kind but negate and repel any other kinds.
Keywords:P  E teaching method  comparison of teaching method  cramming method of teaching  heuristic method of teaching  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号