| 体验认知·惯习·语言礼貌 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢朝群,林大津.体验认知·惯习·语言礼貌[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,10(3):33-38,45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢朝群 林大津 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心,广东,广州,510420
2. 福建师范大学外国语学院,福建,福州,350007 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 福建省社会科学规划(二期)一般项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 语言礼貌研究虽已成为一门显学,但仍有许多重要问题需要澄清和解决.受认知语言学的体验认知观和法国社会哲学家Pierre Bourdieu惯习观的启发,本文通过分析指出,语言礼貌扎根于人类的认知体验,具有身体基础,具有体验性;礼貌从本质上说是一种言后之效,是个人以体验认知和惯习为基础,结合语言形式、语境、意图、情感等诸多复杂因素做出评价的结果.由于评价行为具有争议性、主观性和不确定性等特点,仅仅凭借语言形式作出礼貌或不礼貌的评价不一定行得通.本文最后得出结论:认知评价应当成为语言礼貌研究的核心.
|
| 关 键 词： | 语言礼貌 体验认知 语言惯习 (不)礼貌评价 |
| 文章编号： | 24513320 |
| 修稿时间： | 03 20 2007 12:00AM |
Embodied Cognition, Habitus and Linguistic Politeness |
| |
| XIE Chao-qun,LIN Da-jin.Embodied Cognition, Habitus and Linguistic Politeness[J].Journal of Fujian Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edtion),2007,10(3):33-38,45. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Chao-qun LIN Da-jin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China; 2. Foreigu Languages Institute, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Although linguistic politeness studies have grown into a research subject of much salience,there still remain some essential issues for clarification and resolution.It is argued in this article,inspired by the embodiment notion employed by cognitive linguistics(Gibbs 2006;Lakoff & Johnson 1980,1999) and the habitus notion proposed by French social philosopher Pierre Bourdieu(1977),that linguistic(im)politeness also has a bodily basis,that linguistic(im)politeness,deeply grounded in human experience,is embodied and that,linguistic (im)politeness is in nature a perlocutionary effect based upon evaluations interlocutors make in accordance with their individual embodied cognition and linguistic habitus,with various complex factors taken into consideration,such as linguistic form,context,intention and emotion.Given that the act of evaluation is characterized by,among other things,argumentativity,subjectivity and uncertainty,making polite or impolite evaluations based upon mere linguistic forms is not necessarily plausible.If we want to obtain a deeper and clearer picture of (im)politeness and ourselves,it is concluded,top priority should be given to evaluative judgments in(im)politeness studies. |
| |
| Keywords: | linguistic(im)politeness embodied cognition linguistic habitus (im)politeness evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
