| 学术共同体内外的权力博弈与同行评议制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 阎光才.学术共同体内外的权力博弈与同行评议制度[J].北京大学教育评论,2009,7(1):124-138. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 阎光才 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东师范大学,高等教育研究所,上海,200062 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育科学“十五”规划国家一般项目(BIA050028);;北京市哲学社会科学“十一五”规划重点课题项目(06AaJY007)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在学术活动过程中,学者通常要面对来自个体的自主探究权力、源于学术共同体内部的集体权力(如专业或学科的权力)以及来自外部政府和机构的行政权力等相互间的冲突。在这三种基本的权力博弈中,同行评议似乎因其更能体现学术活动的内在逻辑而获得制度优势。但是,由于学术系统内部存在一个等级结构,少数精英往往主宰了学术认可和资源分配的过程。因此,它与其说是最优的路径选择,毋宁说是权宜之计。一个可供考虑的路径选择未必是废弃同行评议制度,而是如何在其制度设计中体现三种权力间结构性的平衡。
|
| 关 键 词： | 同行评议 学术共同体 博弈 |
THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN ACADEMIC COMMUNITY AND PEER REVIEW |
| |
| Yan Guangcai.THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN ACADEMIC COMMUNITY AND PEER REVIEW[J].Peking University Education Review,2009,7(1):124-138. |
| |
| Authors: | Yan Guangcai |
| |
| Abstract: | In the process of pursuing for truth,a scholar sometimes is confronted with the con- flicts of his own right for freedom of research,the collective power of academic supe- riors and the administrative forces from the government and institution.Peer review seems to have its own advantage because it embodies the inner logic of academic ac- tivities.However,a few elites always dominate the process of academic recognition and the resource distribution due to the existence of a hierarchical structure within acad... |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京大学教育评论》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《北京大学教育评论》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
