| 对"词类活用"说的再认识 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李荣刚.对"词类活用"说的再认识[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,31(6):42-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李荣刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 徐州师范大学,文学院,江苏,徐州,221116 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 徐州师范大学社会科学基金项目(03XWB05) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 古代汉语中的词类活用问题和现代汉语的“名物化”问题如出一辙:“名物化”理论是参照印欧语体系而抹杀了现代汉语自身特点的产物;“词类活用”说则是参照了现代汉语体系而抹杀了古代汉语(文言)自身特点的产物。某些词的固有的功能属性特点为我们认识“词类活用”说提供了认知上的依据。我国的语法传统是“让语法学更有效地为我们的语文教育服务”。“词类活用”说正是这一传统的历史的产物。
|
| 关 键 词： | 名物化 词类活用 语法传统 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-6425(2005)06-0042-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2004-10-30 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年10月30 |
Re-recognition of the Theory of Flexible Usage of Parts of Speech |
| |
| LI Rong-gang.Re-recognition of the Theory of Flexible Usage of Parts of Speech[J].Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2005,31(6):42-44. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Rong-gang |
| |
| Institution: | School of Chinese Studies, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The flexible usage of parts of speech in ancient Chinese is exactly the same with "nominalization" in modern Chinese.The theory of "nominalization" is the product of reference to the system of European language so as to obliterate the features of modern Chinese and the flexible usage of parts of speech is the product of reference to the system of modern Chinese language so as to obliterate the features of ancient Chinese.The inherent function,property and features of some words offer cognitive basis for us to study the flexible usage of parts of speech.The grammatical tradition is to "make grammar serve Chinese education effectively".The flexible usage of parts of speech is a historical product of this tradition. |
| |
| Keywords: | nominalization flexible usage of parts of speech grammatical tradition |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
