Research on multiculturalism in Canada |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Queen''s University, Canada K7L 3N6;2. Sociocultural Psychology, Higher School of Economics, Russian National Research University, Moscow, Russia;1. University of Auckland, New Zealand;2. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand;1. Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;2. Social Aetiology of Mental Illness (SAMI) Training Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;1. Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile;2. University of Groningen, The Netherlands;1. Department of Social Studies, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius;2. Ercomer, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands;1. International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia;2. National University of Singapore, Singapore |
| |
| Abstract: | Canada announced a policy of multiculturalism in 1971. The goal of the policy was to improve the quality of intercultural relations. Two main elements of the policy were proposed as steps towards achieving this goal: support for the maintenance and development of cultural communities (the cultural component); and promotion of intercultural contact along with the reduction of barriers to such participation (the intercultural component). Research on these issues can provide a basis for the development and implementation of multiculturalism policies and programmes. A review of psychological research on multiculturalism over the past 40 years is summarised. Topics include: knowledge about the multiculturalism policy; acceptance of multiculturalism; acceptance of ethnocultural groups; acceptance of immigrants; discrimination and exclusion; and attachment and identity. Research assessing three hypotheses derived from the policy is also briefly reviewed. Current evidence is that there is widespread support for these features of the multicultural way of living in Canada. Of particular importance for the success of multiculturalism is the issue of social cohesion: is the first component (the promotion of cultural diversity) compatible with the second component (the full and equitable participation and inclusion of all ethnocultural groups in civic society)? If they are compatible, together do they lead to the attainment of the fundamental goal of attaining positive intercultural relations? Current psychological evidence suggests that these two components are indeed compatible, and that when present, they are associated with mutual acceptance among ethnocultural groups in Canada. I conclude that research in Canada supports the continuation of the multiculturalism policy and programmes that are intended to improve intercultural relations. |
| |
| Keywords: | Acculturation Contact Cultural maintenance Ethnocultural groups Immigrants Intercultural relations Public attitudes Public policy Social cohesion |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
