| SCIE，Scopus与SciFinder的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张红梅,张秀.SCIE，Scopus与SciFinder的对比分析[J].中华医学图书馆杂志,2011(8):67-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张红梅 张秀 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 沈阳药科大学图书馆,辽宁沈阳110016 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：比较SCIE、Scopus与SciFinder的收录范围、检索结果与引证关系。方法：对3个数据库的基本信息、引证分析功能，以及从关键词、机构与期刊名称3个字段进行实例检索得到的结果进行对比分析。结果：SCIE入选期刊最严格，Scopus收录期刊最多，SciFinder文献类型最全面。结论：SciFinder作为专业检索数据库，检索课题更全面，对检索结果的处理功能更强大。SCIE和Scopus更侧重期刊评价和引文分析，方便特定课题的溯源与追踪，也是写作和投稿很好的参考工具。
|
| 关 键 词： | SCIE Scopus sciFinder 检索功能 引文分析 |
SCIE,Scopus and SciFinder： A comparative analysis |
| |
| ZHANG Hong-mei,ZHANG Xiu.SCIE,Scopus and SciFinder： A comparative analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Library,2011(8):67-70. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hong-mei ZHANG Xiu |
| |
| Institution: | (Library of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the coverage, retrieval results and citation relation of SCIE, Scopus and SciFinder. Methods Basic information, citation analysis function, and retrieval results obtained from SCIE, Scopus and SciFinder using key words, institutions and journal titles were compared journals covered in SCIE was the strictest, the number of journals covered in of literature covered in SciFinder were the most comprehensive. Conclusion As and analyzed. Results The selection of Scopus was the greatest, and the types a specialized database, SciFinder coy- ers more journals with a greater function to process the retrieval results. SCIE and Scopus lay their stress on journal e- valuation and citation analysis, can easily find the history of a special topic, and are also good reference tools for writing and contributing papers. |
| |
| Keywords: | SCIE Scopus SciFinder retrieval function citation analysis |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
