| 四种网络知识表示语言的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 盛小平.四种网络知识表示语言的比较研究[J].情报学报,2004,23(3):333-339. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 盛小平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南科技大学南校区图书馆,湘潭,411201 |
| |
| 摘 要： | TM、DRF(S)、DAML +OIL和OWL日益成为人们普遍采用的网络知识表示语言。本文在简要介绍这四种语言的基础上 ,从XTM与RDF(S)的比较 ,DAML +OIL与RDF(S)的比较 ,OWL与DAML +OIL的比较 ,RDFS、DAML+OIL与OWL的联合比较 ,以及四者的应用比较五个方面论述了它们的异同
|
| 关 键 词： | 知识表示语言 XTM RDF(S) DAML+OIL OWL 比较研究 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年6月26日 |
Comparative Study of Four Networked Knowledge Representation Languages |
| |
| Sheng Xiaoping.Comparative Study of Four Networked Knowledge Representation Languages[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific andTechnical Information,2004,23(3):333-339. |
| |
| Authors: | Sheng Xiaoping |
| |
| Abstract: | XTM, RDF(S),DAML+OIL, and OWL are increasingly becoming networked knowledge representation languages generally adopted by people. Based on brief introduction of the four languages, the paper discusses the similarities and differences of them from the five aspects of comparative studies among XTM and RDF(S), DAML+OIL and RDF(S), OWL and DAML+OIL, RDF(S) & DAML+OIL and OWL, and applications of the four languages. |
| |
| Keywords: | knowledge representation language XTM RDF(S) DAML+OIL OWL comparative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
