| 科学数据分类研究述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闫鑫,黄国彬.科学数据分类研究述评[J].图书馆论坛,2020(5):45-54. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闫鑫 黄国彬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 研究科学数据分类有利于完善科学数据的内容体系,有利于构建更完整有效的科学数据元数据框架体系,有利于揭示科学数据的特殊性与差异性,对科学数据的管理机构、研究机构、高校以及科学数据发布平台等开展科学数据的管理有直接的帮助。文章在文献调研基础上,从数据利用的角度出发,基于内容相关性、数据完整性、数据可靠性与数据权威性,对目前研究中科学数据分类方式和分类结果进行汇总整理,并且对当前科学数据分类体系进行述评。完善当前的科学数据分类体系,为科学数据的管理更加有序奠定基础。当前科学数据的分类大多从内容相关性、数据完整性等角度进行分类,对于从数据权威性角度对科学数据进行分类还没有引起大家的关注,对科学数据的引用研究还需要继续深入。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学数据 数据分类 数据性质 |
A Review of the Study of Research Data Classification |
| |
| YAN Xin,HUANG Guobin.A Review of the Study of Research Data Classification[J].Library Tribune,2020(5):45-54. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Xin HUANG Guobin |
| |
| Abstract: | Study on research data classification is conducive to improving the retrieval and classification of research data,and it is also in favor of building a more complete and effective metadata framework system,revealing the particularity and difference of research data,as well as helping directly scientific institutions such as research data management institutions,research institutions,universities,and research data publishing platforms to manage research data.On the basis of literature review,this paper studies the current data classification in scientific research from the perspective of data usage,focusing on text correlation,data integrity,data reliability and data authority,in order to improve the classification system and lay a foundation for making research data management more orderly.At present,research data are primarily classified by text correlation and data integrity,and the classification based on data authority is paid less attention to.Therefore,the study of research data citations needs to go further. |
| |
| Keywords: | research data data classification data nature |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
