首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于关键词共现网络的我国图情领域近三十年学科发展脉络分析
引用本文:彭陶,王建冬,孙慧明.基于关键词共现网络的我国图情领域近三十年学科发展脉络分析[J].大学图书馆学报,2012,30(2):29-34.
作者姓名:彭陶  王建冬  孙慧明
作者单位:1. 北京大学图书馆,北京,100871
2. 北京大学信息管理系,北京,100871
3. 首都图书馆,北京,100021
摘    要:选取图书馆学、情报学领域各4种核心期刊,构建近30年的关键词共现网络,引入学科隶属度和G-N聚类算法,对图书馆学、情报学领域的知识地图进行共时和历时分析。研究发现:该领域的关键词共现网络符合复杂网络的基本特征。共时分析发现:可将该领域划分为10个板块;属于情报学的5个(信息组织、信息检索、文献计量学、用户研究与服务、网络技术);属于图书馆学的4个(信息资源建设、文献学、资源共建共享、图书馆事业);两学科关注度相当的1个(开放存取)。历时分析发现:1990年以前图书馆学研究的体系性更强;1990-2000年,情报学的发展态势强于图书馆学;2000年后图书馆学则强于情报学。

关 键 词:图书馆学  情报学  共词网络  领域分析  复杂网络  聚类分析  学科隶属度

An Analysis on Development Vein of Chinese Library and Information Science during the Past 30 Years Based on Keywords Co-occurrence Network
Peng Tao,Wang Jiandong and Sun Huiming.An Analysis on Development Vein of Chinese Library and Information Science during the Past 30 Years Based on Keywords Co-occurrence Network[J].Journal of Academic Libraries,2012,30(2):29-34.
Authors:Peng Tao  Wang Jiandong and Sun Huiming
Institution:Peng Tao Wang Jiandong Sun Huiming
Abstract:In this paper,a keywords co-occurrence network of library and information science during the past 30 years was constructed based on 8 core journals in this field.Then the index of disciplinary attribution and G-N clustering algorithm were used in the synchronic and diachronic analysis on the knowledge map of research in library and information science.According to the study,it is found that the Library and Information Science is consistent with the basic characteristics of complex networks.According to the synchronic analysis,it is found that the field of library and information science can be divided into 10 sections;of which 5 belong to information science(information organization,information retrieval,bibliometrics,user research and services,network technology);4 belong to library science(information resources construction,philology,resources joint building and sharing,library cause);and 1 section which is equally concerned by two disciplinary.According to the diachronic analysis,it is found that,before 1990,Library Science has a more systematic research field;during 1990-2000,there was a stronger development trend in the field of information science than library science;however,after 2000,the development trend of Library Science is stronger than Information Science.
Keywords:Library Science  Information Science  Key words Co-occurrence Network  Domain Analysis  Complex Network  Clustering Analysis  Disciplinary Attribution
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大学图书馆学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大学图书馆学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号